PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWRD.L vs. R1GB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWRD.L vs. R1GB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWRD.L) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc (R1GB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SWRD.L is traded in USD, while R1GB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the R1GB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWRD.L achieves a 9.88% return, which is significantly higher than R1GB.L's 6.38% return.


SWRD.L

1D
0.06%
1M
4.05%
YTD
9.88%
6M
11.00%
1Y
26.07%
3Y*
20.92%
5Y*
11.98%
10Y*

R1GB.L

1D
-0.14%
1M
5.38%
YTD
6.38%
6M
6.80%
1Y
25.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWRD.L vs. R1GB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SWRD.L
SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF
9.88%21.09%4.74%
R1GB.L
iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc
6.38%17.73%-15.89%

Correlation

The correlation between SWRD.L and R1GB.L is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2024

0.84

The correlation between SWRD.L and R1GB.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWRD.L vs. R1GB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWRD.L
SWRD.L Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
SWRD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWRD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWRD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SWRD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWRD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

R1GB.L
R1GB.L Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
R1GB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
R1GB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
R1GB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
R1GB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
R1GB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWRD.L vs. R1GB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWRD.L) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc (R1GB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SWRD.LR1GB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.29

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.12

1.62

+1.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.22

5.37

+7.86

SWRD.L vs. R1GB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWRD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is higher than the R1GB.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWRD.L and R1GB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SWRD.LR1GB.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.20

1.68

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.11

+0.71

Drawdowns

SWRD.L vs. R1GB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWRD.L drawdown since its inception was -34.10%, roughly equal to the maximum R1GB.L drawdown of -33.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWRD.L and R1GB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWRD.LR1GB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.10%

-33.80%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.31%

-15.56%

+7.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.49%

-1.54%

+1.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.02%

-13.26%

+8.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

4.71%

-2.74%

Volatility

SWRD.L vs. R1GB.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWRD.L) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc (R1GB.L) have volatilities of 3.33% and 3.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWRD.LR1GB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.33%

3.50%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.04%

10.89%

-1.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.81%

15.00%

-3.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.52%

24.68%

-9.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.26%

24.68%

-7.42%

SWRD.L vs. R1GB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWRD.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than R1GB.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SWRD.L vs. R1GB.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SWRD.L nor R1GB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SWRD.L and R1GB.L have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SWRD.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SWRD.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for R1GB.L.

SWRD.L tracks MSCI World Index, while R1GB.L tracks Russell 1000 Growth UCITS 30/18 Capped Net Tax 15% Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SWRD.L and 0.18% for R1GB.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWRD.L and R1GB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer