SWPRX vs. VT
SWPRX (Schwab Target 2060 Fund) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both funds - SWPRX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by Charles Schwab, while VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index. Over the past 5 years, SWPRX returned 8.98%/yr vs 11.00%/yr for VT. Their 0.97 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. SWPRX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VT.
Performance
SWPRX vs. VT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWPRX achieves a 11.75% return, which is significantly lower than VT's 14.42% return.
SWPRX
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- 1.00%
- 6M
- 7.92%
- YTD
- 11.75%
- 1Y
- 22.16%
- 3Y*
- 17.75%
- 5Y*
- 8.98%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.25%
VT
- 1D
- 1.80%
- 1M
- 2.74%
- 6M
- 10.85%
- YTD
- 14.42%
- 1Y
- 25.39%
- 3Y*
- 20.17%
- 5Y*
- 11.00%
- 10Y*
- 12.58%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.98%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $454.41M | $375.33M | $485.34M |
SWPRX vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWPRX Schwab Target 2060 Fund | 11.75% | 20.66% | 14.28% | 21.13% | -20.24% | 18.59% | 15.58% | 25.05% | -10.61% | 21.77% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 14.42% | 22.43% | 16.49% | 22.02% | -18.00% | 18.27% | 16.59% | 26.81% | -9.76% | 24.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between SWPRX and VT is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017 | 0.97 |
The correlation between SWPRX and VT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SWPRX vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank
SWPRX
VT
SWPRX vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Target 2060 Fund (SWPRX) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SWPRX | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.33 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.51 | 2.64 | -0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.64 | 10.97 | -0.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SWPRX vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWPRX drawdown since its inception was -32.94%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWPRX and VT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWPRX | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.94% | -50.27% | +17.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.57% | -9.67% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.77% | -16.51% | +0.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.97% | -26.38% | -4.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.20% | 0.00% | -0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.36% | -6.97% | +0.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.25% | 2.32% | -0.07% |
Volatility
SWPRX vs. VT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab Target 2060 Fund (SWPRX) is 3.87%, while Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a volatility of 4.39%. This indicates that SWPRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SWPRX | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.87% | 4.39% | -0.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.99% | 11.81% | -0.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.22% | 14.03% | -0.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.17% | 16.25% | -0.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.79% | 17.20% | -0.41% |
SWPRX vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWPRX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than VT's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SWPRX vs. VT - Dividend Comparison
SWPRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.37%, more than VT's 1.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWPRX Schwab Target 2060 Fund | 3.37% | 3.76% | 3.11% | 3.30% | 6.08% | 4.64% | 1.79% | 4.29% | 5.07% | 2.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.55% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, SWPRX and VT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VT has higher volatility (4.39%) compared to SWPRX (3.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWPRX dropped -32.94% vs VT's -50.27%.
VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SWPRX and VT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer