PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWPPX vs. SWLSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWPPX vs. SWLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX) and Schwab Large-Cap Growth Fund™ (SWLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWPPX achieves a 10.09% return, which is significantly higher than SWLSX's 5.00% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SWPPX having a 15.13% annualized return and SWLSX not far ahead at 15.81%.


SWPPX

1D
0.68%
1M
0.16%
6M
7.94%
YTD
10.09%
1Y
21.46%
3Y*
19.39%
5Y*
12.82%
10Y*
15.13%
ALL TIME*
9.77%

SWLSX

1D
1.18%
1M
-2.26%
6M
5.30%
YTD
5.00%
1Y
15.67%
3Y*
19.97%
5Y*
12.62%
10Y*
15.81%
ALL TIME*
11.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

SWPPX vs. SWLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWPPX
Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund
10.09%17.87%24.96%26.26%-18.14%28.67%18.38%31.46%-4.47%21.81%
SWLSX
Schwab Large-Cap Growth Fund™
5.00%19.69%29.41%38.27%-27.00%29.03%29.03%31.02%-7.93%29.01%

Correlation

The correlation between SWPPX and SWLSX is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2006

0.95

The correlation between SWPPX and SWLSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

SWPPX vs. SWLSX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SWPPX
SWLSX

Technology

38.5%
47.7%

Financial Services

11.6%
6.2%

Communication Services

9.9%
14.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
13.1%

Healthcare

8.9%
7.6%

Industrials

8.4%
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
3.2%

Energy

3.0%
0.4%

Utilities

2.2%

-

Real Estate

1.8%

-

Basic Materials

1.7%

-

Technology

SWPPX
38.5%
SWLSX
47.7%

Financial Services

SWPPX
11.6%
SWLSX
6.2%

Communication Services

SWPPX
9.9%
SWLSX
14.3%

Consumer Cyclical

SWPPX
9.5%
SWLSX
13.1%

Healthcare

SWPPX
8.9%
SWLSX
7.6%

Industrials

SWPPX
8.4%
SWLSX
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

SWPPX
4.5%
SWLSX
3.2%

Energy

SWPPX
3.0%
SWLSX
0.4%

Utilities

SWPPX
2.2%
SWLSX

-

Real Estate

SWPPX
1.8%
SWLSX

-

Basic Materials

SWPPX
1.7%
SWLSX

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWPPX vs. SWLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SWPPX
SWPPX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SWPPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWPPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWPPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
SWPPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWPPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

SWLSX
SWLSX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
SWLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
SWLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SWPPX vs. SWLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX) and Schwab Large-Cap Growth Fund™ (SWLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SWPPXSWLSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.14

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.21

0.83

+1.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.45

2.70

+6.75

SWPPX vs. SWLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWPPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is higher than the SWLSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWPPX and SWLSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SWPPX vs. SWLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWPPX drawdown since its inception was -55.06%, which is greater than SWLSX's maximum drawdown of -49.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWPPX and SWLSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWPPXSWLSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.06%

-49.89%

-5.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.89%

-16.17%

+7.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.74%

-22.93%

+4.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.51%

-31.32%

+6.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.80%

-31.32%

-2.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.43%

-5.56%

+4.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.90%

-7.90%

-2.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

4.99%

-2.92%

Volatility

SWPPX vs. SWLSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund (SWPPX) is 3.56%, while Schwab Large-Cap Growth Fund™ (SWLSX) has a volatility of 6.30%. This indicates that SWPPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWPPXSWLSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.56%

6.30%

-2.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.14%

14.54%

-4.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.90%

18.09%

-5.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.04%

21.36%

-4.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.23%

20.96%

-2.73%

SWPPX vs. SWLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWPPX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than SWLSX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

SWPPX vs. SWLSX - Dividend Comparison

SWPPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than SWLSX's 1.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SWLSX
Schwab Large-Cap Growth Fund™
1.11%1.17%0.11%0.04%2.07%7.77%1.07%5.32%12.35%7.92%4.46%17.08%
SWPPX
Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund
1.01%1.11%1.23%1.43%1.67%1.27%1.81%1.95%2.67%1.79%2.55%3.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, SWPPX and SWLSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SWLSX has higher volatility (6.30%) compared to SWPPX (3.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWPPX dropped -55.06% vs SWLSX's -49.89%.

SWPPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWPPX and SWLSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer