PortfoliosLab logo
SWLSX vs. FFIDX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between SWLSX and FFIDX is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

SWLSX vs. FFIDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Large-Cap Growth Fund™ (SWLSX) and Fidelity Fund (FFIDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

SWLSX:

0.64

FFIDX:

0.42

Sortino Ratio

SWLSX:

0.93

FFIDX:

0.62

Omega Ratio

SWLSX:

1.13

FFIDX:

1.09

Calmar Ratio

SWLSX:

0.59

FFIDX:

0.34

Martin Ratio

SWLSX:

2.03

FFIDX:

1.12

Ulcer Index

SWLSX:

6.71%

FFIDX:

6.79%

Daily Std Dev

SWLSX:

25.05%

FFIDX:

22.85%

Max Drawdown

SWLSX:

-49.89%

FFIDX:

-55.29%

Current Drawdown

SWLSX:

-3.38%

FFIDX:

-5.72%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWLSX achieves a 1.17% return, which is significantly higher than FFIDX's -0.11% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SWLSX having a 13.28% annualized return and FFIDX not far behind at 12.89%.


SWLSX

YTD

1.17%

1M

5.68%

6M

1.31%

1Y

15.52%

3Y*

18.22%

5Y*

16.53%

10Y*

13.28%

FFIDX

YTD

-0.11%

1M

4.60%

6M

-2.34%

1Y

9.16%

3Y*

15.61%

5Y*

14.94%

10Y*

12.89%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Schwab Large-Cap Growth Fund™

Fidelity Fund

SWLSX vs. FFIDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWLSX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FFIDX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

SWLSX vs. FFIDX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWLSX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SWLSX is 4747
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SWLSX is 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SWLSX is 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SWLSX is 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SWLSX is 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SWLSX is 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

FFIDX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FFIDX is 3030
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FFIDX is 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FFIDX is 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FFIDX is 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FFIDX is 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FFIDX is 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

SWLSX vs. FFIDX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Large-Cap Growth Fund™ (SWLSX) and Fidelity Fund (FFIDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current SWLSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is higher than the FFIDX Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWLSX and FFIDX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

SWLSX vs. FFIDX - Dividend Comparison

SWLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, while FFIDX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
SWLSX
Schwab Large-Cap Growth Fund™
0.11%0.11%0.04%2.07%7.77%1.07%5.32%12.36%7.92%4.46%17.08%11.32%
FFIDX
Fidelity Fund
0.00%0.00%2.41%0.67%4.60%2.96%5.41%7.40%11.61%7.01%5.48%11.61%

Drawdowns

SWLSX vs. FFIDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWLSX drawdown since its inception was -49.89%, smaller than the maximum FFIDX drawdown of -55.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWLSX and FFIDX.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

SWLSX vs. FFIDX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Large-Cap Growth Fund™ (SWLSX) has a higher volatility of 5.71% compared to Fidelity Fund (FFIDX) at 4.96%. This indicates that SWLSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFIDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...