SWP vs. CNAV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SWP (SWP Growth & Income ETF) and CNAV (Mohr Company Nav ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SWP returned 24.32% vs 72.64% for CNAV. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SWP charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.31%/yr for CNAV.

Performance

SWP vs. CNAV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SWP Growth & Income ETF (SWP) and Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWP achieves a 6.98% return, which is significantly lower than CNAV's 47.26% return.

SWP

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: 2.19%
• YTD: 6.98%
• 6M: 6.48%
• 1Y: 24.32%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CNAV

• 1D: 1.11%
• 1M: 21.60%
• YTD: 47.26%
• 6M: 48.02%
• 1Y: 72.64%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWP vs. CNAV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SWP SWP Growth & Income ETF	6.98%	16.86%	1.31%
CNAV Mohr Company Nav ETF	47.26%	16.80%	6.34%

Correlation

The correlation between SWP and CNAV is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2024	0.72

The correlation between SWP and CNAV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SWP vs. CNAV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWP

SWP Risk / Return Rank: 60
SWP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
SWP Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
SWP Omega Ratio Rank: 62
SWP Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
SWP Martin Ratio Rank: 62

CNAV

CNAV Risk / Return Rank: 87
CNAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
CNAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
CNAV Omega Ratio Rank: 81
CNAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
CNAV Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWP vs. CNAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SWP Growth & Income ETF (SWP) and Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SWP	CNAV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.05	2.91	-0.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.89	3.62	-0.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.48	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.45	5.63	-3.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.91	24.09	-13.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SWP vs. CNAV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWP Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the CNAV Sharpe Ratio of 2.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWP and CNAV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SWP	CNAV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.05	2.91	-0.86
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.04	1.62	-0.58

Drawdowns

SWP vs. CNAV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWP drawdown since its inception was -16.41%, smaller than the maximum CNAV drawdown of -30.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWP and CNAV.

Drawdown Indicators

	SWP	CNAV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.41%	-30.06%	+13.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.97%	-12.97%	+3.00%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.69%	0.00%	-0.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.42%	-5.42%	+3.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.23%	3.02%	-0.79%

Volatility

SWP vs. CNAV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SWP Growth & Income ETF (SWP) is 2.56%, while Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV) has a volatility of 12.28%. This indicates that SWP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNAV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SWP	CNAV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.56%	12.28%	-9.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.45%	21.02%	-11.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.91%	25.08%	-13.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.52%	27.16%	-12.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.52%	27.16%	-12.64%

SWP vs. CNAV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWP has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than CNAV's 1.31% expense ratio.

Dividends

SWP vs. CNAV - Dividend Comparison

SWP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.83%, while CNAV has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CNAV Mohr Company Nav ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SWP SWP Growth & Income ETF	6.83%	5.64%	0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SWP and CNAV in my portfolio?

SWP and CNAV have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SWP or CNAV?

CNAV has higher volatility (12.28%) compared to SWP (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWP dropped -16.41% vs CNAV's -30.06%.

Which ETF is better, SWP or CNAV?

On 1-year performance, CNAV leads with 72.64% vs 24.32% for SWP. On fees, SWP is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, SWP has been the lower-risk option at 2.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SWP or CNAV?

Over the 1-year period, CNAV has performed better with a 72.64% return vs 24.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SWP or CNAV?

SWP is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for CNAV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SWP or CNAV?

SWP has the higher dividend yield at 6.83%, compared with 0.00% for CNAV.

What is the main difference between SWP and CNAV?

They also come from different issuers: SWP Investment Management and Mohr. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for SWP and 1.31% for CNAV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CNAV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.