SWP vs. BUFH

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SWP (SWP Growth & Income ETF) and BUFH (FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SWP is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by SWP Investment Management, while BUFH is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SWP charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BUFH.

Performance

SWP vs. BUFH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SWP Growth & Income ETF (SWP) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWP achieves a 5.13% return, which is significantly higher than BUFH's 2.30% return.

SWP

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: -0.96%
• YTD: 5.13%
• 6M: 4.51%
• 1Y: 19.64%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BUFH

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 0.02%
• YTD: 2.30%
• 6M: 2.33%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWP vs. BUFH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SWP SWP Growth & Income ETF	5.13%	12.61%
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF	2.30%	3.81%

Correlation

The correlation between SWP and BUFH is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025	0.69

Return for Risk

SWP vs. BUFH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWP

SWP Risk / Return Rank: 51
SWP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
SWP Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
SWP Omega Ratio Rank: 51
SWP Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
SWP Martin Ratio Rank: 54

BUFH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWP vs. BUFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SWP Growth & Income ETF (SWP) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SWP	BUFH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.64	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.32	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.98	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.67	—	—

Drawdowns

SWP vs. BUFH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWP drawdown since its inception was -16.41%, which is greater than BUFH's maximum drawdown of -1.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWP and BUFH.

Drawdown Indicators

	SWP	BUFH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.41%	-1.53%	-14.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.97%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.47%	-0.26%	-2.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.39%	-0.18%	-2.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.27%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SWP	BUFH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.05%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.57%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.10%	2.38%	+9.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.44%	2.38%	+12.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.44%	2.38%	+12.06%

SWP vs. BUFH - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWP has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than BUFH's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

SWP vs. BUFH - Dividend Comparison

SWP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.95%, while BUFH has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SWP SWP Growth & Income ETF	6.95%	5.64%	0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SWP and BUFH in my portfolio?

SWP and BUFH have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SWP or BUFH?

On fees, BUFH is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SWP or BUFH?

BUFH is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for SWP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SWP or BUFH?

SWP has the higher dividend yield at 6.95%, compared with 0.00% for BUFH.

What is the main difference between SWP and BUFH?

SWP is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFH is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: SWP Investment Management and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for SWP and 0.95% for BUFH.