SWLSX vs. FFRHX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

SWLSX (Schwab Large-Cap Growth Fund™) and FFRHX (Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund) are both mutual funds - SWLSX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Charles Schwab, while FFRHX is a Bank Loan fund actively managed by Fidelity. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, SWLSX returned 16.70%/yr vs 4.94%/yr for FFRHX. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SWLSX charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for FFRHX.

Performance

SWLSX vs. FFRHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Large-Cap Growth Fund™ (SWLSX) and Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWLSX achieves a 8.77% return, which is significantly higher than FFRHX's 1.71% return. Over the past 10 years, SWLSX has outperformed FFRHX with an annualized return of 16.70%, while FFRHX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.94% annualized return.

SWLSX

• 1D: 1.67%
• 1M: 0.44%
• YTD: 8.77%
• 6M: 8.06%
• 1Y: 27.14%
• 3Y*: 22.83%
• 5Y*: 15.06%
• 10Y*: 16.70%

FFRHX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.22%
• YTD: 1.71%
• 6M: 2.32%
• 1Y: 5.89%
• 3Y*: 7.17%
• 5Y*: 5.40%
• 10Y*: 4.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWLSX vs. FFRHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SWLSX Schwab Large-Cap Growth Fund™	8.77%	19.69%	29.41%	38.27%	-27.00%	29.03%	29.03%	31.02%	-7.93%	29.01%
FFRHX Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund	1.71%	5.47%	7.10%	12.63%	-1.55%	5.01%	1.69%	8.63%	0.10%	3.91%

Correlation

The correlation between SWLSX and FFRHX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.28
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2006	0.22

Return for Risk

SWLSX vs. FFRHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWLSX

SWLSX Risk / Return Rank: 29
SWLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
SWLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
SWLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 31
SWLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
SWLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 25

FFRHX

FFRHX Risk / Return Rank: 92
FFRHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
FFRHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
FFRHX Omega Ratio Rank: 97
FFRHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
FFRHX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWLSX vs. FFRHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Large-Cap Growth Fund™ (SWLSX) and Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SWLSX	FFRHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.56	2.50	-0.94
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.14	5.94	-3.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.87	-0.60
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.63	4.97	-3.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.55	17.11	-11.57

SWLSX vs. FFRHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWLSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is lower than the FFRHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWLSX and FFRHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SWLSX vs. FFRHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWLSX drawdown since its inception was -49.89%, which is greater than FFRHX's maximum drawdown of -22.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWLSX and FFRHX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SWLSX	FFRHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.89%	-22.20%	-27.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.17%	-1.19%	-14.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.93%	-3.29%	-19.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.32%	-5.90%	-25.42%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.32%	-22.20%	-9.12%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.16%	-0.44%	-1.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.92%	-1.15%	-6.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.75%	0.35%	+4.40%

Volatility

SWLSX vs. FFRHX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Large-Cap Growth Fund™ (SWLSX) has a higher volatility of 6.40% compared to Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX) at 0.66%. This indicates that SWLSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFRHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SWLSX	FFRHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.40%	0.66%	+5.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.44%	1.63%	+11.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.92%	2.37%	+14.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.18%	2.88%	+18.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.91%	4.14%	+16.77%

SWLSX vs. FFRHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWLSX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FFRHX's 0.67% expense ratio.

Dividends

SWLSX vs. FFRHX - Dividend Comparison

SWLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, less than FFRHX's 7.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FFRHX Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund	7.09%	7.41%	6.94%	8.24%	3.81%	2.74%	3.84%	5.15%	4.74%	4.05%	4.44%	3.69%
SWLSX Schwab Large-Cap Growth Fund™	1.07%	1.17%	0.11%	0.04%	2.07%	7.77%	1.07%	5.32%	12.35%	7.92%	4.46%	17.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SWLSX and FFRHX in my portfolio?

SWLSX and FFRHX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SWLSX or FFRHX?

SWLSX has higher volatility (6.40%) compared to FFRHX (0.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWLSX dropped -49.89% vs FFRHX's -22.20%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFRHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.