PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWLSX vs. ACIHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWLSX vs. ACIHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Large-Cap Growth Fund™ (SWLSX) and American Century Growth Fund G Class (ACIHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWLSX achieves a 11.17% return, which is significantly higher than ACIHX's 8.95% return.


SWLSX

1D
0.08%
1M
7.06%
YTD
11.17%
6M
10.00%
1Y
29.73%
3Y*
24.86%
5Y*
16.18%
10Y*
16.76%

ACIHX

1D
-0.51%
1M
7.84%
YTD
8.95%
6M
8.02%
1Y
27.75%
3Y*
23.07%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWLSX vs. ACIHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SWLSX
Schwab Large-Cap Growth Fund™
11.17%19.69%29.41%38.27%-5.22%
ACIHX
American Century Growth Fund G Class
8.95%16.26%27.35%44.64%-6.24%

Correlation

The correlation between SWLSX and ACIHX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2022

0.98

The correlation between SWLSX and ACIHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWLSX vs. ACIHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWLSX
SWLSX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
SWLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
SWLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

ACIHX
ACIHX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
ACIHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACIHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACIHX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
ACIHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACIHX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWLSX vs. ACIHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Large-Cap Growth Fund™ (SWLSX) and American Century Growth Fund G Class (ACIHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SWLSXACIHXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.92

1.83

+0.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.60

2.48

+0.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.32

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

1.75

+0.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.56

5.88

+0.68

SWLSX vs. ACIHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWLSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the ACIHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWLSX and ACIHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SWLSXACIHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.92

1.83

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

1.02

-0.45

Drawdowns

SWLSX vs. ACIHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWLSX drawdown since its inception was -49.89%, which is greater than ACIHX's maximum drawdown of -24.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWLSX and ACIHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWLSXACIHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.89%

-24.00%

-25.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.17%

-16.40%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.93%

-24.00%

+1.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.51%

+0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.94%

-4.89%

-3.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.67%

4.87%

-0.20%

Volatility

SWLSX vs. ACIHX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Large-Cap Growth Fund™ (SWLSX) and American Century Growth Fund G Class (ACIHX) have volatilities of 3.46% and 3.44%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWLSXACIHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.46%

3.44%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.26%

11.92%

+0.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.02%

15.71%

+0.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.04%

21.05%

-0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.84%

21.05%

-0.21%

SWLSX vs. ACIHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWLSX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than ACIHX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

SWLSX vs. ACIHX - Dividend Comparison

SWLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than ACIHX's 14.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACIHX
American Century Growth Fund G Class
14.64%15.95%5.65%4.61%2.86%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SWLSX
Schwab Large-Cap Growth Fund™
1.05%1.17%0.11%0.04%2.07%7.77%1.07%5.32%12.35%7.92%4.46%17.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, SWLSX and ACIHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SWLSX has higher volatility (3.46%) compared to ACIHX (3.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWLSX dropped -49.89% vs ACIHX's -24.00%.

SWLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWLSX and ACIHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer