SWLGX vs. FDSSX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

SWLGX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund) and FDSSX (Fidelity Stock Selector All Cap Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, SWLGX returned 11.85%/yr vs 12.16%/yr for FDSSX. Their correlation of 0.93 means they have usually moved in the same direction. SWLGX charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for FDSSX.

Performance

SWLGX vs. FDSSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) and Fidelity Stock Selector All Cap Fund (FDSSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWLGX achieves a 0.29% return, which is significantly lower than FDSSX's 15.33% return.

SWLGX

• 1D: 0.80%
• 1M: -2.44%
• 6M: 1.56%
• YTD: 0.29%
• 1Y: 10.12%
• 3Y*: 19.35%
• 5Y*: 11.85%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 16.66%

FDSSX

• 1D: 0.73%
• 1M: -0.07%
• 6M: 11.74%
• YTD: 15.33%
• 1Y: 29.29%
• 3Y*: 20.09%
• 5Y*: 12.16%
• 10Y*: 15.00%
• ALL TIME*: 11.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FDSSX Fidelity Stock Selector All Cap Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

SWLGX vs. FDSSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund	0.29%	18.55%	33.30%	42.67%	-29.17%	27.55%	38.43%	36.30%	-1.59%	-0.60%
FDSSX Fidelity Stock Selector All Cap Fund	15.33%	18.89%	19.79%	26.94%	-19.55%	23.14%	24.90%	32.21%	-8.61%	-0.91%

Correlation

The correlation between SWLGX and FDSSX is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2017	0.93

The correlation between SWLGX and FDSSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SWLGX vs. FDSSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SWLGX

SWLGX Risk / Return Rank: 10
SWLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
SWLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
SWLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 10
SWLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
SWLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

FDSSX

FDSSX Risk / Return Rank: 80
FDSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
FDSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
FDSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 74
FDSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
FDSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SWLGX vs. FDSSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) and Fidelity Stock Selector All Cap Fund (FDSSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SWLGX	FDSSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.46	1.89	-1.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.75	2.59	-1.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.34	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.50	2.94	-2.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.49	13.29	-11.81

SWLGX vs. FDSSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWLGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is lower than the FDSSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWLGX and FDSSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SWLGX vs. FDSSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWLGX drawdown since its inception was -32.69%, smaller than the maximum FDSSX drawdown of -56.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWLGX and FDSSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SWLGX	FDSSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.69%	-56.77%	+24.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.16%	-9.19%	-6.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.30%	-20.86%	-2.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.69%	-25.22%	-7.47%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.37%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.01%	-1.58%	-6.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.03%	-9.84%	+2.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.39%	2.03%	+3.36%

Volatility

SWLGX vs. FDSSX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) has a higher volatility of 6.43% compared to Fidelity Stock Selector All Cap Fund (FDSSX) at 3.79%. This indicates that SWLGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDSSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SWLGX	FDSSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.43%	3.79%	+2.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.03%	11.40%	+2.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.51%	14.27%	+3.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.80%	17.90%	+3.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.68%	18.58%	+4.10%

SWLGX vs. FDSSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWLGX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than FDSSX's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

SWLGX vs. FDSSX - Dividend Comparison

SWLGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than FDSSX's 4.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDSSX Fidelity Stock Selector All Cap Fund	4.15%	4.79%	4.83%	2.03%	0.36%	0.84%	5.22%	6.09%	4.46%	3.07%	1.04%	5.16%
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund	0.46%	0.46%	0.52%	0.67%	0.93%	1.76%	0.67%	0.96%	1.03%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SWLGX and FDSSX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, SWLGX and FDSSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SWLGX or FDSSX?

SWLGX has higher volatility (6.43%) compared to FDSSX (3.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWLGX dropped -32.69% vs FDSSX's -56.77%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDSSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.