PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWGRX vs. SFLNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWGRX vs. SFLNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Target 2015 Fund (SWGRX) and Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund (SFLNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWGRX achieves a 4.55% return, which is significantly lower than SFLNX's 14.66% return. Over the past 10 years, SWGRX has underperformed SFLNX with an annualized return of 6.12%, while SFLNX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.26% annualized return.


SWGRX

1D
0.09%
1M
2.04%
YTD
4.55%
6M
4.73%
1Y
12.96%
3Y*
10.28%
5Y*
4.67%
10Y*
6.12%

SFLNX

1D
0.46%
1M
4.08%
YTD
14.66%
6M
14.73%
1Y
32.46%
3Y*
20.93%
5Y*
12.96%
10Y*
14.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWGRX vs. SFLNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWGRX
Schwab Target 2015 Fund
4.55%11.78%7.90%12.46%-14.56%7.50%11.47%15.05%-3.79%10.76%
SFLNX
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund
14.66%17.02%16.78%18.16%-6.89%31.64%9.12%28.91%-7.43%17.08%

Correlation

The correlation between SWGRX and SFLNX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2008

0.86

The correlation between SWGRX and SFLNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWGRX vs. SFLNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWGRX
SWGRX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SWGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
SWGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

SFLNX
SFLNX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
SFLNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFLNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFLNX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
SFLNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFLNX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWGRX vs. SFLNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Target 2015 Fund (SWGRX) and Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund (SFLNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SWGRXSFLNXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.31

3.23

-0.92

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.36

4.50

-1.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.59

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

5.47

-2.68

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.38

21.47

-9.10

SWGRX vs. SFLNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWGRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the SFLNX Sharpe Ratio of 3.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWGRX and SFLNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SWGRXSFLNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

3.23

-0.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.85

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.78

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.53

+0.02

Drawdowns

SWGRX vs. SFLNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWGRX drawdown since its inception was -34.83%, smaller than the maximum SFLNX drawdown of -56.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWGRX and SFLNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWGRXSFLNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.83%

-56.18%

+21.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.70%

-6.10%

+1.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.12%

-16.27%

+9.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.46%

-18.98%

-5.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.46%

-37.59%

+13.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.79%

-6.01%

+1.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.06%

1.55%

-0.49%

Volatility

SWGRX vs. SFLNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Target 2015 Fund (SWGRX) is 1.91%, while Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund (SFLNX) has a volatility of 2.48%. This indicates that SWGRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SFLNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWGRXSFLNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.91%

2.48%

-0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.56%

7.43%

-2.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.68%

10.35%

-4.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.38%

15.26%

-4.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.79%

18.40%

-9.61%

SWGRX vs. SFLNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWGRX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than SFLNX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SWGRX vs. SFLNX - Dividend Comparison

SWGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.48%, more than SFLNX's 1.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SFLNX
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund
1.46%1.68%1.78%1.86%2.09%4.78%6.17%5.33%9.69%3.28%7.23%5.68%
SWGRX
Schwab Target 2015 Fund
8.48%8.87%8.02%6.06%6.48%6.90%4.41%5.44%5.15%5.67%5.27%7.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


SWGRX and SFLNX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SFLNX has higher volatility (2.48%) compared to SWGRX (1.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWGRX dropped -34.83% vs SFLNX's -56.18%.

SFLNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.23 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWGRX and SFLNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer