PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWGRX vs. JLKYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SWGRX vs. JLKYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Target 2015 Fund (SWGRX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SWGRX vs. JLKYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWGRX
Schwab Target 2015 Fund
-2.00%11.78%7.90%12.46%-14.56%7.50%11.47%15.05%-3.79%10.76%
JLKYX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio
-4.04%20.04%15.41%18.53%-18.04%18.38%16.13%25.07%-8.32%17.29%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWGRX achieves a -2.00% return, which is significantly higher than JLKYX's -4.04% return. Over the past 10 years, SWGRX has underperformed JLKYX with an annualized return of 5.57%, while JLKYX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.03% annualized return.


SWGRX

1D
0.19%
1M
-4.53%
YTD
-2.00%
6M
-0.42%
1Y
8.53%
3Y*
8.26%
5Y*
3.94%
10Y*
5.57%

JLKYX

1D
-0.31%
1M
-8.64%
YTD
-4.04%
6M
-1.30%
1Y
16.72%
3Y*
14.20%
5Y*
7.74%
10Y*
10.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SWGRX vs. JLKYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWGRX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than JLKYX's 0.01% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

SWGRX vs. JLKYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWGRX
SWGRX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SWGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SWGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

JLKYX
JLKYX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
JLKYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JLKYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
JLKYX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
JLKYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
JLKYX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWGRX vs. JLKYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Target 2015 Fund (SWGRX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SWGRXJLKYXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.22

1.05

+0.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.74

1.54

+0.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.23

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

1.30

+0.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.99

6.13

+0.86

SWGRX vs. JLKYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWGRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is comparable to the JLKYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWGRX and JLKYX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SWGRXJLKYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.22

1.05

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.51

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.62

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.57

-0.04

Correlation

The correlation between SWGRX and JLKYX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

SWGRX vs. JLKYX - Dividend Comparison

SWGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.05%, more than JLKYX's 3.76% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SWGRX
Schwab Target 2015 Fund
9.05%8.87%8.02%6.06%6.48%6.90%4.41%5.44%5.15%5.67%5.27%7.08%
JLKYX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio
3.76%3.61%1.77%2.16%8.08%5.71%3.88%8.54%10.69%4.33%3.23%1.75%

Drawdowns

SWGRX vs. JLKYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWGRX drawdown since its inception was -34.83%, which is greater than JLKYX's maximum drawdown of -32.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWGRX and JLKYX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SWGRXJLKYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.83%

-32.55%

-2.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.07%

-11.59%

+6.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.46%

-25.75%

+1.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.46%

-32.55%

+8.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.53%

-9.16%

+4.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.83%

-4.71%

-0.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.19%

2.45%

-1.26%

Volatility

SWGRX vs. JLKYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Target 2015 Fund (SWGRX) is 2.53%, while John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKYX) has a volatility of 5.03%. This indicates that SWGRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JLKYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SWGRXJLKYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.53%

5.03%

-2.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.16%

9.09%

-4.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.12%

16.20%

-9.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.34%

15.11%

-4.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.76%

16.14%

-7.38%