SWDA.L vs. XRSG.L

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

SWDA.L (iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and XRSG.L (Xtrackers Russell 2000 UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - SWDA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index, while XRSG.L is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SWDA.L returned 12.56%/yr vs 10.00%/yr for XRSG.L. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SWDA.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for XRSG.L.

Performance

SWDA.L vs. XRSG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) and Xtrackers Russell 2000 UCITS ETF 1C (XRSG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWDA.L achieves a 9.33% return, which is significantly lower than XRSG.L's 19.15% return. Over the past 10 years, SWDA.L has outperformed XRSG.L with an annualized return of 12.56%, while XRSG.L has yielded a comparatively lower 10.00% annualized return.

SWDA.L

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: -1.61%
• 6M: 8.59%
• YTD: 9.33%
• 1Y: 20.19%
• 3Y*: 16.57%
• 5Y*: 11.82%
• 10Y*: 12.56%
• ALL TIME*: 9.05%

XRSG.L

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: -2.05%
• 6M: 12.42%
• YTD: 19.15%
• 1Y: 32.92%
• 3Y*: 13.88%
• 5Y*: 7.27%
• 10Y*: 10.00%
• ALL TIME*: 6.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWDA.L vs. XRSG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SWDA.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	9.33%	12.64%	21.11%	17.59%	-8.33%	23.64%	12.25%	23.03%	-3.78%	11.78%
XRSG.L Xtrackers Russell 2000 UCITS ETF 1C	19.15%	4.65%	11.80%	12.16%	-11.47%	15.43%	15.81%	20.64%	-7.63%	4.40%

Correlation

The correlation between SWDA.L and XRSG.L is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2015	0.79

The correlation between SWDA.L and XRSG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

SWDA.L vs. XRSG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SWDA.L	XRSG.L
Technology	30.3%	14.8%
Financial Services	16.3%	17.7%
Industrials	11.1%	14.1%
Healthcare	8.9%	20.3%
Consumer Cyclical	8.9%	9.2%
Communication Services	8.5%	2.2%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	2.6%
Energy	3.8%	5.4%
Basic Materials	3.1%	4.4%
Utilities	2.5%	2.7%
Real Estate	1.7%	6.7%

Return for Risk

SWDA.L vs. XRSG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWDA.L

SWDA.L Risk / Return Rank: 81
SWDA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
SWDA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
SWDA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 80
SWDA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
SWDA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 83

XRSG.L

XRSG.L Risk / Return Rank: 81
XRSG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
XRSG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
XRSG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 74
XRSG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
XRSG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWDA.L vs. XRSG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) and Xtrackers Russell 2000 UCITS ETF 1C (XRSG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SWDA.L	XRSG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.92	1.95	-0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.71	2.69	+0.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.33	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.07	3.81	-0.74
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.89	10.93	+0.96

SWDA.L vs. XRSG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWDA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the XRSG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWDA.L and XRSG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SWDA.L vs. XRSG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWDA.L drawdown since its inception was -41.70%, smaller than the maximum XRSG.L drawdown of -48.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWDA.L and XRSG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	SWDA.L	XRSG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.70%	-48.07%	+6.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.55%	-8.61%	+2.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.50%	-30.09%	+11.59%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.50%	-30.09%	+11.59%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.58%	-35.31%	+9.73%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.61%	-3.83%	+2.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.44%	-13.78%	+4.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.69%	3.00%	-1.31%

Volatility

SWDA.L vs. XRSG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) is 2.67%, while Xtrackers Russell 2000 UCITS ETF 1C (XRSG.L) has a volatility of 4.40%. This indicates that SWDA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XRSG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SWDA.L	XRSG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.67%	4.40%	-1.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.71%	12.15%	-4.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.47%	16.84%	-6.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.33%	23.62%	-10.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.51%	22.54%	-8.03%

SWDA.L vs. XRSG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWDA.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than XRSG.L's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

SWDA.L vs. XRSG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SWDA.L nor XRSG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SWDA.L and XRSG.L in my portfolio?

SWDA.L and XRSG.L have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SWDA.L or XRSG.L?

On fees, SWDA.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SWDA.L or XRSG.L?

SWDA.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for XRSG.L.

What is the main difference between SWDA.L and XRSG.L?

SWDA.L is categorized as Global Equities, while XRSG.L is Small Cap Blend Equities. SWDA.L tracks MSCI World Index, while XRSG.L tracks Russell 2000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SWDA.L and 0.30% for XRSG.L.