SWDA.L vs. ICLN
SWDA.L (iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and ICLN (iShares Global Clean Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SWDA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index, while ICLN is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Clean Energy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SWDA.L returned 12.56%/yr vs 8.61%/yr for ICLN. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SWDA.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for ICLN.
Performance
SWDA.L vs. ICLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SWDA.L is traded in GBp, while ICLN is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ICLN values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWDA.L achieves a 9.33% return, which is significantly lower than ICLN's 11.03% return. Over the past 10 years, SWDA.L has outperformed ICLN with an annualized return of 12.56%, while ICLN has yielded a comparatively lower 8.61% annualized return.
SWDA.L
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -1.61%
- 6M
- 8.59%
- YTD
- 9.33%
- 1Y
- 20.19%
- 3Y*
- 16.57%
- 5Y*
- 11.82%
- 10Y*
- 12.56%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.05%
ICLN
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- -15.46%
- 6M
- 2.32%
- YTD
- 11.03%
- 1Y
- 34.86%
- 3Y*
- -1.04%
- 5Y*
- -2.85%
- 10Y*
- 8.61%
- ALL TIME*
- -1.68%
SWDA.L vs. ICLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWDA.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 9.33% | 12.64% | 21.11% | 17.59% | -8.33% | 23.64% | 12.25% | 23.03% | -3.78% | 11.78% |
ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF | 11.03% | 36.57% | -24.42% | -24.38% | 5.82% | -23.46% | 134.72% | 38.87% | -3.64% | 10.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between SWDA.L and ICLN is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2009 | 0.46 |
The correlation between SWDA.L and ICLN shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (3 years) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SWDA.L vs. ICLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SWDA.L
ICLN
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
SWDA.L
ICLN
Financial Services
SWDA.L
ICLN
Industrials
SWDA.L
ICLN
Healthcare
SWDA.L
ICLN
-
Consumer Cyclical
SWDA.L
ICLN
Communication Services
SWDA.L
ICLN
-
Consumer Defensive
SWDA.L
ICLN
-
Energy
SWDA.L
ICLN
Basic Materials
SWDA.L
ICLN
Utilities
SWDA.L
ICLN
Real Estate
SWDA.L
ICLN
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SWDA.L vs. ICLN — Risk / Return Rank
SWDA.L
ICLN
SWDA.L vs. ICLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SWDA.L | ICLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.21 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.07 | 1.51 | +1.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.89 | 5.06 | +6.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SWDA.L vs. ICLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWDA.L drawdown since its inception was -41.70%, smaller than the maximum ICLN drawdown of -84.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWDA.L and ICLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWDA.L | ICLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.70% | -84.40% | +42.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.55% | -23.23% | +16.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.50% | -41.98% | +23.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.50% | -57.04% | +38.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.58% | -64.68% | +39.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.61% | -41.10% | +39.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.44% | -57.47% | +48.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.69% | 6.91% | -5.22% |
Volatility
SWDA.L vs. ICLN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) is 2.67%, while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) has a volatility of 11.10%. This indicates that SWDA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SWDA.L | ICLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.67% | 11.10% | -8.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.71% | 23.27% | -15.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.47% | 28.49% | -18.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.33% | 26.01% | -12.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.51% | 26.44% | -11.93% |
SWDA.L vs. ICLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWDA.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than ICLN's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
SWDA.L vs. ICLN - Dividend Comparison
SWDA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ICLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF | 1.02% | 1.63% | 1.85% | 1.59% | 0.89% | 1.18% | 0.34% | 1.36% | 2.77% | 2.49% | 3.88% | 2.36% |
SWDA.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SWDA.L and ICLN have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SWDA.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SWDA.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for ICLN.
SWDA.L is categorized as Global Equities, while ICLN is Alternative Energy Equities. SWDA.L tracks MSCI World Index, while ICLN tracks S&P Global Clean Energy Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SWDA.L and 0.39% for ICLN.
Find the right allocation for SWDA.L and ICLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer