SWBGX vs. DGTSX
SWBGX (Schwab MarketTrack Balanced Portfolio™) and DGTSX (DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, SWBGX returned 8.33%/yr vs 5.28%/yr for DGTSX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SWBGX charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for DGTSX.
Performance
SWBGX vs. DGTSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWBGX achieves a 7.18% return, which is significantly higher than DGTSX's 4.23% return. Over the past 10 years, SWBGX has outperformed DGTSX with an annualized return of 8.33%, while DGTSX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.28% annualized return.
SWBGX
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- YTD
- 7.18%
- 6M
- 6.74%
- 1Y
- 17.34%
- 3Y*
- 13.10%
- 5Y*
- 6.63%
- 10Y*
- 8.33%
DGTSX
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- 4.23%
- 6M
- 4.08%
- 1Y
- 9.62%
- 3Y*
- 8.40%
- 5Y*
- 5.27%
- 10Y*
- 5.28%
SWBGX vs. DGTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWBGX Schwab MarketTrack Balanced Portfolio™ | 7.18% | 14.73% | 9.10% | 14.99% | -14.35% | 12.85% | 10.50% | 18.56% | -5.43% | 12.70% |
DGTSX DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio | 4.23% | 8.39% | 7.43% | 8.93% | -8.06% | 10.20% | 7.29% | 9.80% | -1.85% | 5.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between SWBGX and DGTSX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 26, 2003 | 0.94 |
The correlation between SWBGX and DGTSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SWBGX vs. DGTSX — Risk / Return Rank
SWBGX
DGTSX
SWBGX vs. DGTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab MarketTrack Balanced Portfolio™ (SWBGX) and DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio (DGTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SWBGX | DGTSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.57 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.07 | 3.76 | -0.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.19 | 16.52 | -3.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SWBGX vs. DGTSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWBGX drawdown since its inception was -40.37%, which is greater than DGTSX's maximum drawdown of -16.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWBGX and DGTSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWBGX | DGTSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.37% | -16.71% | -23.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.89% | -2.64% | -3.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.69% | -7.46% | -2.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.97% | -11.26% | -12.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.97% | -11.26% | -12.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.61% | -0.20% | -0.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.40% | -1.64% | -3.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.37% | 0.60% | +0.77% |
Volatility
SWBGX vs. DGTSX - Volatility Comparison
Schwab MarketTrack Balanced Portfolio™ (SWBGX) has a higher volatility of 2.89% compared to DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio (DGTSX) at 1.38%. This indicates that SWBGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SWBGX | DGTSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.89% | 1.38% | +1.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.50% | 2.97% | +3.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.09% | 3.60% | +4.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.07% | 5.98% | +5.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.99% | 5.24% | +5.75% |
SWBGX vs. DGTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWBGX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than DGTSX's 0.24% expense ratio.
Dividends
SWBGX vs. DGTSX - Dividend Comparison
SWBGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.18%, more than DGTSX's 5.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGTSX DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio | 5.70% | 5.54% | 7.28% | 4.75% | 2.77% | 7.62% | 2.12% | 2.57% | 2.99% | 1.25% | 1.26% | 1.50% |
SWBGX Schwab MarketTrack Balanced Portfolio™ | 7.18% | 7.69% | 10.74% | 4.23% | 4.13% | 5.02% | 6.41% | 4.42% | 7.11% | 5.30% | 3.18% | 14.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, SWBGX and DGTSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SWBGX has higher volatility (2.89%) compared to DGTSX (1.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWBGX dropped -40.37% vs DGTSX's -16.71%.
DGTSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SWBGX and DGTSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer