SWAN vs. THRV
SWAN (Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF) and THRV (Prospera Income ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. SWAN is passively managed, while THRV is actively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SWAN charges 0.49%/yr vs 1.80%/yr for THRV.
Performance
SWAN vs. THRV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWAN achieves a 3.29% return, which is significantly higher than THRV's 1.77% return.
SWAN
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- -0.50%
- YTD
- 3.29%
- 6M
- 2.73%
- 1Y
- 14.05%
- 3Y*
- 12.19%
- 5Y*
- 2.87%
- 10Y*
- —
THRV
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- -0.35%
- YTD
- 1.77%
- 6M
- 1.87%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SWAN vs. THRV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SWAN Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF | 3.29% | 2.04% |
THRV Prospera Income ETF | 1.77% | 0.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between SWAN and THRV is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2025 | 0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SWAN vs. THRV — Risk / Return Rank
SWAN
THRV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SWAN vs. THRV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF (SWAN) and Prospera Income ETF (THRV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SWAN | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.00 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.65 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SWAN vs. THRV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWAN drawdown since its inception was -31.04%, which is greater than THRV's maximum drawdown of -1.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWAN and THRV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWAN | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.04% | -1.50% | -29.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.05% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.43% | -0.60% | -1.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.83% | -0.44% | -8.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.84% | — | — |
Volatility
SWAN vs. THRV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SWAN | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.97% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.97% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.00% | 2.95% | +7.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.43% | 2.95% | +8.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.49% | 2.95% | +9.54% |
SWAN vs. THRV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWAN has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than THRV's 1.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
SWAN vs. THRV - Dividend Comparison
SWAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%, less than THRV's 5.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWAN Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF | 2.84% | 2.86% | 2.54% | 2.98% | 2.12% | 5.04% | 1.64% | 3.69% | 0.29% |
THRV Prospera Income ETF | 5.40% | 1.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SWAN and THRV have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SWAN is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SWAN is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.80% for THRV.
THRV has the higher dividend yield at 5.40%, compared with 2.84% for SWAN.
They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Prospera Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for SWAN and 1.80% for THRV.
Find the right allocation for SWAN and THRV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer