SWAN vs. SPHQ
SWAN (Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF) and SPHQ (Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SWAN is a Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the S-Network BlackSwan Core Index, while SPHQ is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SWAN returned 3.05%/yr vs 14.55%/yr for SPHQ. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SWAN charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SPHQ.
Performance
SWAN vs. SPHQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWAN achieves a 3.83% return, which is significantly lower than SPHQ's 16.79% return.
SWAN
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- YTD
- 3.83%
- 6M
- 3.97%
- 1Y
- 15.52%
- 3Y*
- 12.40%
- 5Y*
- 3.05%
- 10Y*
- —
SPHQ
- 1D
- 1.02%
- 1M
- 5.74%
- YTD
- 16.79%
- 6M
- 15.77%
- 1Y
- 26.53%
- 3Y*
- 22.40%
- 5Y*
- 14.55%
- 10Y*
- 15.27%
SWAN vs. SPHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWAN Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF | 3.83% | 13.93% | 13.44% | 12.07% | -27.77% | 10.55% | 16.17% | 22.03% | -2.27% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 16.79% | 13.25% | 25.44% | 24.83% | -15.76% | 28.03% | 17.36% | 33.64% | -9.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between SWAN and SPHQ is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2018 | 0.70 |
The correlation between SWAN and SPHQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SWAN vs. SPHQ — Risk / Return Rank
SWAN
SPHQ
SWAN vs. SPHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF (SWAN) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SWAN | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.32 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.09 | 2.75 | -0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.04 | 11.76 | -3.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SWAN vs. SPHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWAN drawdown since its inception was -31.04%, smaller than the maximum SPHQ drawdown of -57.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWAN and SPHQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWAN | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.04% | -57.83% | +26.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.05% | -8.90% | +1.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.07% | -16.57% | +4.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.04% | -25.04% | -6.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.92% | 0.00% | -1.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.85% | -10.69% | +1.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.83% | 2.09% | -0.26% |
Volatility
SWAN vs. SPHQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF (SWAN) is 3.95%, while Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) has a volatility of 4.92%. This indicates that SWAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SWAN | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.95% | 4.92% | -0.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.78% | 10.83% | -3.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.78% | 13.18% | -3.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.39% | 16.53% | -5.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.49% | 17.90% | -5.41% |
SWAN vs. SPHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWAN has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHQ's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
SWAN vs. SPHQ - Dividend Comparison
SWAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, more than SPHQ's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 1.03% | 1.09% | 1.15% | 1.42% | 1.85% | 1.19% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.85% | 1.57% | 1.67% | 2.29% |
SWAN Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF | 2.83% | 2.86% | 2.54% | 2.98% | 2.12% | 5.04% | 1.64% | 3.69% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SWAN and SPHQ have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPHQ has higher volatility (4.92%) compared to SWAN (3.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWAN dropped -31.04% vs SPHQ's -57.83%.
On 5-year performance, SPHQ leads with 14.55% vs 3.05% for SWAN. On fees, SPHQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SWAN has been the lower-risk option at 3.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPHQ has performed better with a 14.55% return vs 3.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPHQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for SWAN.
SWAN has the higher dividend yield at 2.83%, compared with 1.03% for SPHQ.
SWAN is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while SPHQ is S&P 500. SWAN tracks S-Network BlackSwan Core Index, while SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for SWAN and 0.15% for SPHQ.
SPHQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SWAN and SPHQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer