SWAN vs. QDVO

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SWAN (Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF) and QDVO (Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SWAN is a Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the S-Network BlackSwan Core Index, while QDVO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify. SWAN is passively managed, while QDVO is actively managed. Over the past year, SWAN returned 14.05% vs 21.13% for QDVO. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SWAN charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for QDVO.

Performance

SWAN vs. QDVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF (SWAN) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWAN achieves a 3.29% return, which is significantly lower than QDVO's 5.51% return.

SWAN

• 1D: -0.65%
• 1M: -0.50%
• YTD: 3.29%
• 6M: 2.73%
• 1Y: 14.05%
• 3Y*: 12.19%
• 5Y*: 2.87%
• 10Y*: —

QDVO

• 1D: -1.31%
• 1M: -3.62%
• YTD: 5.51%
• 6M: 4.58%
• 1Y: 21.13%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWAN vs. QDVO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SWAN Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF	3.29%	13.93%	-0.86%
QDVO Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF	5.51%	20.16%	9.76%

Correlation

The correlation between SWAN and QDVO is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2024	0.75

The correlation between SWAN and QDVO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SWAN vs. QDVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWAN

SWAN Risk / Return Rank: 43
SWAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
SWAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
SWAN Omega Ratio Rank: 40
SWAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
SWAN Martin Ratio Rank: 48

QDVO

QDVO Risk / Return Rank: 48
QDVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
QDVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
QDVO Omega Ratio Rank: 48
QDVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
QDVO Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWAN vs. QDVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF (SWAN) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SWAN	QDVO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.42	1.68	-0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.02	2.31	-0.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.30	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.00	2.08	-0.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.65	8.08	-0.43

SWAN vs. QDVO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWAN Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is comparable to the QDVO Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWAN and QDVO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SWAN vs. QDVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWAN drawdown since its inception was -31.04%, which is greater than QDVO's maximum drawdown of -17.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWAN and QDVO.

Drawdown Indicators

	SWAN	QDVO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.04%	-17.75%	-13.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.05%	-10.21%	+3.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.07%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.04%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.43%	-4.81%	+2.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.83%	-2.41%	-6.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.84%	2.62%	-0.78%

Volatility

SWAN vs. QDVO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF (SWAN) is 3.97%, while Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO) has a volatility of 4.47%. This indicates that SWAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SWAN	QDVO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.97%	4.47%	-0.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.97%	9.59%	-1.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.00%	12.69%	-2.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.43%	17.54%	-6.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.49%	17.54%	-5.05%

SWAN vs. QDVO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWAN has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than QDVO's 0.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

SWAN vs. QDVO - Dividend Comparison

SWAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%, less than QDVO's 10.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
QDVO Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF	10.53%	9.92%	2.79%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SWAN Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF	2.84%	2.86%	2.54%	2.98%	2.12%	5.04%	1.64%	3.69%	0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SWAN and QDVO in my portfolio?

SWAN and QDVO have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SWAN or QDVO?

QDVO has higher volatility (4.47%) compared to SWAN (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWAN dropped -31.04% vs QDVO's -17.75%.

Which ETF is better, SWAN or QDVO?

On 1-year performance, QDVO leads with 21.13% vs 14.05% for SWAN. On fees, SWAN is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, SWAN has been the lower-risk option at 3.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SWAN or QDVO?

Over the 1-year period, QDVO has performed better with a 21.13% return vs 14.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SWAN or QDVO?

SWAN is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for QDVO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SWAN or QDVO?

QDVO has the higher dividend yield at 10.53%, compared with 2.84% for SWAN.

What is the main difference between SWAN and QDVO?

SWAN is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while QDVO is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for SWAN and 0.56% for QDVO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QDVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.