SWAGX vs. QLEIX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SWAGX (Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund) and QLEIX (AQR Long-Short Equity Fund) are both mutual funds - SWAGX is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index, while QLEIX is a Long-Short fund actively managed by AQR Funds. SWAGX is passively managed, while QLEIX is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SWAGX returned -0.17%/yr vs 23.47%/yr for QLEIX. At a correlation of -0.15, they often move in opposite directions. SWAGX charges 0.04%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for QLEIX.

Performance

SWAGX vs. QLEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund (SWAGX) and AQR Long-Short Equity Fund (QLEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWAGX achieves a 0.05% return, which is significantly higher than QLEIX's -0.52% return.

SWAGX

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: 0.47%
• YTD: 0.05%
• 6M: 0.40%
• 1Y: 4.19%
• 3Y*: 3.85%
• 5Y*: -0.17%
• 10Y*: —

QLEIX

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 1.15%
• YTD: -0.52%
• 6M: -1.13%
• 1Y: 15.49%
• 3Y*: 25.79%
• 5Y*: 23.47%
• 10Y*: 12.26%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWAGX vs. QLEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SWAGX Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund	0.05%	7.11%	1.38%	5.46%	-13.62%	-2.29%	7.39%	8.64%	-0.11%	2.62%
QLEIX AQR Long-Short Equity Fund	-0.52%	34.43%	30.50%	23.95%	19.18%	31.10%	-13.92%	1.19%	-16.33%	12.72%

Correlation

The correlation between SWAGX and QLEIX is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.05
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2017	-0.15

The correlation between SWAGX and QLEIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (all time) to 0.07 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SWAGX vs. QLEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWAGX

SWAGX Risk / Return Rank: 17
SWAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
SWAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
SWAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 15
SWAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
SWAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 16

QLEIX

QLEIX Risk / Return Rank: 57
QLEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
QLEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
QLEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 61
QLEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
QLEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWAGX vs. QLEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund (SWAGX) and AQR Long-Short Equity Fund (QLEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SWAGX	QLEIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.09	2.16	-1.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.65	3.15	-1.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.40	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.42	2.64	-1.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.02	8.20	-4.18

SWAGX vs. QLEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWAGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the QLEIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWAGX and QLEIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SWAGX vs. QLEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWAGX drawdown since its inception was -19.68%, smaller than the maximum QLEIX drawdown of -38.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWAGX and QLEIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SWAGX	QLEIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.68%	-38.11%	+18.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.05%	-6.01%	+2.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.14%	-7.07%	+0.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.76%	-17.07%	-1.69%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-38.11%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.71%	-1.13%	-2.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.67%	-7.70%	+2.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.07%	1.93%	-0.86%

Volatility

SWAGX vs. QLEIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund (SWAGX) is 1.09%, while AQR Long-Short Equity Fund (QLEIX) has a volatility of 2.82%. This indicates that SWAGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QLEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SWAGX	QLEIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.09%	2.82%	-1.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.96%	5.76%	-2.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.98%	7.37%	-3.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.09%	10.02%	-3.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.11%	10.59%	-5.48%

SWAGX vs. QLEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWAGX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than QLEIX's 1.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

SWAGX vs. QLEIX - Dividend Comparison

SWAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%, more than QLEIX's 1.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QLEIX AQR Long-Short Equity Fund	1.76%	1.75%	7.12%	20.88%	14.15%	0.00%	1.57%	0.00%	6.03%	9.11%	3.01%	4.98%
SWAGX Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund	4.15%	4.02%	3.88%	3.22%	1.93%	1.56%	2.47%	2.87%	2.80%	1.98%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SWAGX and QLEIX in my portfolio?

SWAGX and QLEIX have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SWAGX or QLEIX?

QLEIX has higher volatility (2.82%) compared to SWAGX (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWAGX dropped -19.68% vs QLEIX's -38.11%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QLEIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.