SVR.TO vs. COPP
SVR.TO (iShares Silver Bullion ETF) and COPP (Sprott Copper Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SVR.TO is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price, while COPP is a Copper fund tracking the Nasdaq Sprott Copper Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SVR.TO returned 64.16% vs 89.08% for COPP. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SVR.TO charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for COPP.
Performance
SVR.TO vs. COPP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SVR.TO is traded in CAD, while COPP is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the COPP values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SVR.TO achieves a -14.79% return, which is significantly lower than COPP's 15.65% return.
SVR.TO
- 1D
- -5.75%
- 1M
- -19.00%
- YTD
- -14.79%
- 6M
- -15.47%
- 1Y
- 64.16%
- 3Y*
- 36.86%
- 5Y*
- 16.45%
- 10Y*
- 10.99%
COPP
- 1D
- -6.32%
- 1M
- 1.14%
- YTD
- 15.65%
- 6M
- 14.21%
- 1Y
- 89.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SVR.TO vs. COPP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SVR.TO iShares Silver Bullion ETF | -14.79% | 140.56% | 19.43% |
COPP Sprott Copper Miners ETF | 15.65% | 66.07% | 10.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between SVR.TO and COPP is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2024 | 0.57 |
The correlation between SVR.TO and COPP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SVR.TO vs. COPP — Risk / Return Rank
SVR.TO
COPP
SVR.TO vs. COPP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Silver Bullion ETF (SVR.TO) and Sprott Copper Miners ETF (COPP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SVR.TO | COPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.31 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.35 | 3.12 | -1.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.89 | 10.61 | -7.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SVR.TO vs. COPP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SVR.TO drawdown since its inception was -77.85%, which is greater than COPP's maximum drawdown of -41.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SVR.TO and COPP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SVR.TO | COPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.85% | -41.79% | -36.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.79% | -28.73% | -19.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.79% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.79% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.79% | -12.83% | -34.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.37% | -12.84% | -38.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.29% | 8.43% | +13.86% |
Volatility
SVR.TO vs. COPP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Silver Bullion ETF (SVR.TO) is 14.05%, while Sprott Copper Miners ETF (COPP) has a volatility of 18.66%. This indicates that SVR.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COPP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SVR.TO | COPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.05% | 18.66% | -4.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.17% | 39.38% | +17.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.05% | 45.17% | +13.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.46% | 41.80% | -5.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.43% | 41.80% | -9.37% |
SVR.TO vs. COPP - Expense Ratio Comparison
SVR.TO has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than COPP's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
SVR.TO vs. COPP - Dividend Comparison
SVR.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
COPP Sprott Copper Miners ETF | 2.12% | 2.37% | 2.59% |
SVR.TO iShares Silver Bullion ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SVR.TO and COPP have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, COPP is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
COPP is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for SVR.TO.
SVR.TO is categorized as Silver, while COPP is Copper. SVR.TO tracks LBMA Silver Price, while COPP tracks Nasdaq Sprott Copper Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for SVR.TO and 0.65% for COPP.
Find the right allocation for SVR.TO and COPP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer