PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SVR-C.TO vs. XSLE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SVR-C.TO vs. XSLE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) (SVR-C.TO) and Xtrackers IE Physical Silver (EUR Hedged) ETC Securities (XSLE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SVR-C.TO is traded in CAD, while XSLE.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XSLE.DE values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SVR-C.TO achieves a -14.35% return, which is significantly higher than XSLE.DE's -25.64% return.


SVR-C.TO

1D
1.87%
1M
-19.40%
YTD
-14.35%
6M
-19.83%
1Y
70.15%
3Y*
39.87%
5Y*
20.27%
10Y*
12.54%

XSLE.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-23.46%
YTD
-25.64%
6M
-25.64%
1Y
54.05%
3Y*
36.38%
5Y*
15.13%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SVR-C.TO vs. XSLE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SVR-C.TO
iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged)
-14.35%132.91%30.61%-2.65%9.69%-13.03%53.53%
XSLE.DE
Xtrackers IE Physical Silver (EUR Hedged) ETC Securities
-25.64%167.43%23.32%-4.19%0.47%-22.22%71.92%

Correlation

The correlation between SVR-C.TO and XSLE.DE is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2020

0.65

The correlation between SVR-C.TO and XSLE.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (5 years) to 0.81 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SVR-C.TO vs. XSLE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SVR-C.TO
SVR-C.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
SVR-C.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SVR-C.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
SVR-C.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
SVR-C.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
SVR-C.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

XSLE.DE
XSLE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
XSLE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSLE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSLE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
XSLE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSLE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SVR-C.TO vs. XSLE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) (SVR-C.TO) and Xtrackers IE Physical Silver (EUR Hedged) ETC Securities (XSLE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SVR-C.TOXSLE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.20

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.44

1.06

+0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.11

2.32

+0.79

SVR-C.TO vs. XSLE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SVR-C.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is higher than the XSLE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SVR-C.TO and XSLE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SVR-C.TO vs. XSLE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SVR-C.TO drawdown since its inception was -53.26%, roughly equal to the maximum XSLE.DE drawdown of -52.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SVR-C.TO and XSLE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SVR-C.TOXSLE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.26%

-52.12%

-1.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-48.86%

-50.51%

+1.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.86%

-50.51%

+1.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.86%

-50.51%

+1.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.01%

-50.51%

+3.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.94%

-22.42%

-6.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.60%

23.20%

-0.60%

Volatility

SVR-C.TO vs. XSLE.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) (SVR-C.TO) and Xtrackers IE Physical Silver (EUR Hedged) ETC Securities (XSLE.DE) have volatilities of 15.32% and 15.70%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SVR-C.TOXSLE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.32%

15.70%

-0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

56.48%

56.00%

+0.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.58%

59.46%

-0.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.84%

38.31%

-2.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.73%

38.21%

-6.48%

SVR-C.TO vs. XSLE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SVR-C.TO has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than XSLE.DE's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

SVR-C.TO vs. XSLE.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SVR-C.TO nor XSLE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SVR-C.TO and XSLE.DE have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SVR-C.TO is cheaper at 0.66% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SVR-C.TO is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for XSLE.DE.

SVR-C.TO tracks LBMA Silver Price, while XSLE.DE tracks LBMA Silver Price (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for SVR-C.TO and 0.73% for XSLE.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SVR-C.TO and XSLE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer