SVR-C.TO vs. BRNT.L
SVR-C.TO (iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged)) and BRNT.L (WisdomTree Brent Crude Oil) are both exchange-traded funds - SVR-C.TO is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price, while BRNT.L is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Brent Crude Subindex. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SVR-C.TO returned 14.84%/yr vs 13.88%/yr for BRNT.L. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SVR-C.TO charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for BRNT.L.
Performance
SVR-C.TO vs. BRNT.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SVR-C.TO is traded in CAD, while BRNT.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BRNT.L values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SVR-C.TO achieves a -3.47% return, which is significantly lower than BRNT.L's 70.94% return. Over the past 10 years, SVR-C.TO has outperformed BRNT.L with an annualized return of 14.84%, while BRNT.L has yielded a comparatively lower 13.88% annualized return.
SVR-C.TO
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- -17.08%
- YTD
- -3.47%
- 6M
- 10.25%
- 1Y
- 89.11%
- 3Y*
- 43.04%
- 5Y*
- 22.05%
- 10Y*
- 14.84%
BRNT.L
- 1D
- -6.02%
- 1M
- -9.33%
- YTD
- 70.94%
- 6M
- 72.71%
- 1Y
- 56.63%
- 3Y*
- 24.91%
- 5Y*
- 24.98%
- 10Y*
- 13.88%
SVR-C.TO vs. BRNT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SVR-C.TO iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) | -3.47% | 132.91% | 30.61% | -2.65% | 9.69% | -13.03% | 43.88% | 9.28% | -2.35% | -2.30% |
BRNT.L WisdomTree Brent Crude Oil | 70.94% | -10.62% | 16.55% | -1.33% | 43.66% | 66.17% | -34.80% | 26.92% | -6.74% | 4.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between SVR-C.TO and BRNT.L is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2012 | 0.06 |
The correlation between SVR-C.TO and BRNT.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.07 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SVR-C.TO vs. BRNT.L — Risk / Return Rank
SVR-C.TO
BRNT.L
SVR-C.TO vs. BRNT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) (SVR-C.TO) and WisdomTree Brent Crude Oil (BRNT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SVR-C.TO | BRNT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.28 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.03 | 3.48 | -1.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.36 | 6.70 | -2.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SVR-C.TO vs. BRNT.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SVR-C.TO drawdown since its inception was -53.26%, smaller than the maximum BRNT.L drawdown of -81.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SVR-C.TO and BRNT.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SVR-C.TO | BRNT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.26% | -81.85% | +28.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.91% | -18.22% | -25.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.91% | -23.80% | -20.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.91% | -27.56% | -16.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.91% | -69.24% | +25.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.29% | -14.03% | -26.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.89% | -35.28% | +6.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.45% | 9.47% | +10.98% |
Volatility
SVR-C.TO vs. BRNT.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) (SVR-C.TO) has a higher volatility of 15.49% compared to WisdomTree Brent Crude Oil (BRNT.L) at 13.34%. This indicates that SVR-C.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRNT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SVR-C.TO | BRNT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.49% | 13.34% | +2.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.18% | 38.03% | +18.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.55% | 42.96% | +14.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.53% | 34.92% | +0.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.58% | 35.24% | -3.66% |
SVR-C.TO vs. BRNT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SVR-C.TO has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than BRNT.L's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
SVR-C.TO vs. BRNT.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SVR-C.TO nor BRNT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SVR-C.TO and BRNT.L have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BRNT.L is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BRNT.L is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for SVR-C.TO.
SVR-C.TO is categorized as Silver, while BRNT.L is Oil & Gas. SVR-C.TO tracks LBMA Silver Price, while BRNT.L tracks Bloomberg Brent Crude Subindex. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for SVR-C.TO and 0.49% for BRNT.L.
Find the right allocation for SVR-C.TO and BRNT.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer