SVOL vs. DBMF

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

SVOL (Simplify Volatility Premium ETF) and DBMF (iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SVOL is a Volatility fund actively managed by Simplify, while DBMF is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by iM Global Partners. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SVOL returned 6.22%/yr vs 8.01%/yr for DBMF. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SVOL charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DBMF.

Performance

SVOL vs. DBMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Volatility Premium ETF (SVOL) and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SVOL achieves a -0.84% return, which is significantly lower than DBMF's 10.27% return.

SVOL

• 1D: 1.14%
• 1M: 1.82%
• YTD: -0.84%
• 6M: 0.96%
• 1Y: 10.32%
• 3Y*: 5.92%
• 5Y*: 6.22%
• 10Y*: —

DBMF

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: -0.96%
• YTD: 10.27%
• 6M: 11.24%
• 1Y: 27.33%
• 3Y*: 9.64%
• 5Y*: 8.01%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SVOL vs. DBMF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SVOL Simplify Volatility Premium ETF	-0.84%	2.41%	6.77%	22.88%	-3.30%	12.70%
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF	10.27%	13.85%	7.24%	-8.94%	21.61%	2.25%

Correlation

The correlation between SVOL and DBMF is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2021	0.11

Over the past year, SVOL and DBMF have become more correlated (0.37) than their long-term average of 0.11, meaning their price movements have been converging.

SVOL vs. DBMF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SVOL	DBMF
Technology	31.9%	29.8%
Financial Services	11.4%	12.5%
Industrials	11.4%	8.4%
Healthcare	11.0%	12.7%
Consumer Cyclical	9.4%	11.0%
Communication Services	7.4%	8.6%
Consumer Defensive	5.1%	6.1%
Energy	4.8%	3.9%
Real Estate	2.8%	2.5%
Basic Materials	2.5%	2.2%
Utilities	2.3%	2.3%

Return for Risk

SVOL vs. DBMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SVOL

SVOL Risk / Return Rank: 19
SVOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
SVOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
SVOL Omega Ratio Rank: 19
SVOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
SVOL Martin Ratio Rank: 19

DBMF

DBMF Risk / Return Rank: 84
DBMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
DBMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
DBMF Omega Ratio Rank: 87
DBMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
DBMF Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SVOL vs. DBMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Volatility Premium ETF (SVOL) and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SVOL	DBMF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.50	2.22	-1.73
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.83	2.92	-2.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.47	-0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.80	4.50	-3.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.90	16.30	-14.40

SVOL vs. DBMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SVOL Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is lower than the DBMF Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SVOL and DBMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SVOL vs. DBMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SVOL drawdown since its inception was -33.50%, which is greater than DBMF's maximum drawdown of -20.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SVOL and DBMF.

Drawdown Indicators

	SVOL	DBMF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.50%	-20.39%	-13.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.01%	-6.10%	-6.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.50%	-15.60%	-17.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.50%	-20.39%	-13.11%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.40%	-1.91%	-1.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.76%	-6.56%	+1.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.50%	1.68%	+3.82%

Volatility

SVOL vs. DBMF - Volatility Comparison

Simplify Volatility Premium ETF (SVOL) has a higher volatility of 3.48% compared to iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) at 2.71%. This indicates that SVOL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SVOL	DBMF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.48%	2.71%	+0.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.95%	10.00%	-0.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.81%	12.35%	+8.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.01%	12.55%	+9.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.90%	12.41%	+9.49%

SVOL vs. DBMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SVOL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than DBMF's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

SVOL vs. DBMF - Dividend Comparison

SVOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.19%, more than DBMF's 5.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF	5.19%	5.91%	5.75%	2.91%	7.72%	10.38%	0.86%	9.35%
SVOL Simplify Volatility Premium ETF	22.19%	19.82%	16.79%	16.36%	18.32%	4.65%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SVOL and DBMF in my portfolio?

SVOL and DBMF have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SVOL or DBMF?

SVOL has higher volatility (3.48%) compared to DBMF (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SVOL dropped -33.50% vs DBMF's -20.39%.

Which ETF is better, SVOL or DBMF?

On 5-year performance, DBMF leads with 8.01% vs 6.22% for SVOL. On fees, SVOL is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, DBMF has been the lower-risk option at 2.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SVOL or DBMF?

Over the 5-year period, DBMF has performed better with a 8.01% return vs 6.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SVOL or DBMF?

SVOL is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBMF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SVOL or DBMF?

SVOL has the higher dividend yield at 22.19%, compared with 5.19% for DBMF.

What is the main difference between SVOL and DBMF?

SVOL is categorized as Volatility, while DBMF is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and iM Global Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SVOL and 0.85% for DBMF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DBMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.