SVAL vs. CGDV
SVAL (iShares US Small Cap Value Factor ETF) and CGDV (Capital Group Dividend Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SVAL is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Focused Value Select Index, while CGDV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group. SVAL is passively managed, while CGDV is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SVAL returned 16.07%/yr vs 22.55%/yr for CGDV. Their 0.74 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SVAL charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for CGDV.
Performance
SVAL vs. CGDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SVAL achieves a 25.30% return, which is significantly higher than CGDV's 14.16% return.
SVAL
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 2.62%
- 6M
- 17.08%
- YTD
- 25.30%
- 1Y
- 43.73%
- 3Y*
- 16.07%
- 5Y*
- 9.86%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 17.62%
CGDV
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 1.21%
- 6M
- 11.03%
- YTD
- 14.16%
- 1Y
- 25.16%
- 3Y*
- 22.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 19.56%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $192.53M | $192.47M | $184.78M | |
| $620.93K | $633.76K | $608.86K |
SVAL vs. CGDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SVAL iShares US Small Cap Value Factor ETF | 25.30% | 8.23% | 7.54% | 12.27% | -5.76% |
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF | 14.16% | 25.50% | 20.10% | 28.81% | -0.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between SVAL and CGDV is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2022 | 0.74 |
The correlation between SVAL and CGDV shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.74 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SVAL vs. CGDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SVAL
CGDV
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Financial Services
SVAL
CGDV
Industrials
SVAL
CGDV
Healthcare
SVAL
CGDV
Consumer Cyclical
SVAL
CGDV
Technology
SVAL
CGDV
Energy
SVAL
CGDV
Real Estate
SVAL
CGDV
Basic Materials
SVAL
CGDV
Consumer Defensive
SVAL
CGDV
Utilities
SVAL
CGDV
Communication Services
SVAL
CGDV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SVAL vs. CGDV — Risk / Return Rank
SVAL
CGDV
SVAL vs. CGDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares US Small Cap Value Factor ETF (SVAL) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SVAL | CGDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.35 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.59 | 2.44 | +2.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.49 | 11.39 | +4.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SVAL vs. CGDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SVAL drawdown since its inception was -27.44%, which is greater than CGDV's maximum drawdown of -21.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SVAL and CGDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SVAL | CGDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.44% | -21.82% | -5.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.94% | -9.75% | +0.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.44% | -14.28% | -13.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.79% | 0.00% | -0.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.29% | -3.52% | -4.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.64% | 2.09% | +0.55% |
Volatility
SVAL vs. CGDV - Volatility Comparison
iShares US Small Cap Value Factor ETF (SVAL) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) have volatilities of 3.19% and 3.28%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SVAL | CGDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.19% | 3.28% | -0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.99% | 10.06% | +0.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.03% | 12.55% | +4.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.01% | 15.48% | +6.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.04% | 15.48% | +7.56% |
SVAL vs. CGDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SVAL has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CGDV's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
SVAL vs. CGDV - Dividend Comparison
SVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, more than CGDV's 1.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF | 1.18% | 1.29% | 1.60% | 1.65% | 1.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SVAL iShares US Small Cap Value Factor ETF | 2.04% | 2.33% | 1.82% | 2.25% | 2.09% | 2.33% | 0.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SVAL and CGDV have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CGDV has higher volatility (3.28%) compared to SVAL (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SVAL dropped -27.44% vs CGDV's -21.82%.
On 3-year performance, CGDV leads with 22.55% vs 16.07% for SVAL. On fees, SVAL is cheaper at 0.20% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CGDV has performed better with a 22.55% return vs 16.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SVAL is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for CGDV.
SVAL has the higher dividend yield at 2.04%, compared with 1.18% for CGDV.
SVAL is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while CGDV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Capital Group. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SVAL and 0.33% for CGDV.
SVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SVAL and CGDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer