PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SVAL vs. CGDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SVAL vs. CGDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares US Small Cap Value Factor ETF (SVAL) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SVAL achieves a 15.99% return, which is significantly higher than CGDV's 11.89% return.


SVAL

1D
-1.51%
1M
2.08%
YTD
15.99%
6M
15.39%
1Y
34.88%
3Y*
17.30%
5Y*
6.47%
10Y*

CGDV

1D
-0.55%
1M
5.09%
YTD
11.89%
6M
12.43%
1Y
30.91%
3Y*
25.14%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SVAL vs. CGDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SVAL
iShares US Small Cap Value Factor ETF
15.99%8.23%7.54%12.27%-5.88%
CGDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
11.89%25.50%20.10%28.81%-2.89%

Correlation

The correlation between SVAL and CGDV is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022

0.76

The correlation between SVAL and CGDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

SVAL vs. CGDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SVAL
CGDV

Financial Services

23.7%
6.8%

Industrials

15.8%
13.2%

Consumer Cyclical

13.7%
10.6%

Technology

10.7%
34.1%

Healthcare

10.3%
11.5%

Energy

7.7%
3.8%

Basic Materials

6.1%
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.1%
5.5%

Utilities

3.3%
2.1%

Real Estate

2.7%
1.1%

Communication Services

1.8%
8.4%

Financial Services

SVAL
23.7%
CGDV
6.8%

Industrials

SVAL
15.8%
CGDV
13.2%

Consumer Cyclical

SVAL
13.7%
CGDV
10.6%

Technology

SVAL
10.7%
CGDV
34.1%

Healthcare

SVAL
10.3%
CGDV
11.5%

Energy

SVAL
7.7%
CGDV
3.8%

Basic Materials

SVAL
6.1%
CGDV
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

SVAL
4.1%
CGDV
5.5%

Utilities

SVAL
3.3%
CGDV
2.1%

Real Estate

SVAL
2.7%
CGDV
1.1%

Communication Services

SVAL
1.8%
CGDV
8.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SVAL vs. CGDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SVAL
SVAL Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
SVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
SVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

CGDV
CGDV Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
CGDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGDV Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
CGDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGDV Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SVAL vs. CGDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares US Small Cap Value Factor ETF (SVAL) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SVALCGDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.50

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.92

3.18

+0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.29

15.06

-2.77

SVAL vs. CGDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SVAL Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the CGDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SVAL and CGDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SVALCGDVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.97

2.68

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

1.24

-0.54

Drawdowns

SVAL vs. CGDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SVAL drawdown since its inception was -27.44%, which is greater than CGDV's maximum drawdown of -21.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SVAL and CGDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SVALCGDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.44%

-21.82%

-5.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.94%

-9.75%

+0.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.44%

-14.28%

-13.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.51%

-0.55%

-0.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.51%

-3.62%

-4.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.85%

2.06%

+0.79%

Volatility

SVAL vs. CGDV - Volatility Comparison

iShares US Small Cap Value Factor ETF (SVAL) has a higher volatility of 4.31% compared to Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) at 3.09%. This indicates that SVAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SVALCGDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.31%

3.09%

+1.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.62%

9.13%

+2.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.87%

11.59%

+6.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.33%

15.48%

+6.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.27%

15.48%

+7.79%

SVAL vs. CGDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SVAL has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CGDV's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

SVAL vs. CGDV - Dividend Comparison

SVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, more than CGDV's 1.17% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
CGDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
1.17%1.29%1.60%1.65%1.36%0.00%0.00%
SVAL
iShares US Small Cap Value Factor ETF
2.27%2.33%1.82%2.25%2.09%2.33%0.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


SVAL and CGDV have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SVAL has higher volatility (4.31%) compared to CGDV (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SVAL dropped -27.44% vs CGDV's -21.82%.

On 3-year performance, CGDV leads with 25.14% vs 17.30% for SVAL. On fees, SVAL is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, CGDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, CGDV has performed better with a 25.14% return vs 17.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SVAL is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for CGDV.

SVAL has the higher dividend yield at 2.27%, compared with 1.17% for CGDV.

SVAL is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while CGDV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Capital Group. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SVAL and 0.33% for CGDV.

CGDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SVAL and CGDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer