SVAL vs. ACWI
SVAL (iShares US Small Cap Value Factor ETF) and ACWI (iShares MSCI ACWI ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SVAL is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Focused Value Select Index, while ACWI is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SVAL returned 6.47%/yr vs 11.28%/yr for ACWI. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SVAL charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for ACWI.
Performance
SVAL vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SVAL achieves a 15.99% return, which is significantly higher than ACWI's 12.13% return.
SVAL
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- 2.08%
- YTD
- 15.99%
- 6M
- 15.39%
- 1Y
- 34.88%
- 3Y*
- 17.30%
- 5Y*
- 6.47%
- 10Y*
- —
ACWI
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 5.28%
- YTD
- 12.13%
- 6M
- 12.96%
- 1Y
- 29.18%
- 3Y*
- 21.15%
- 5Y*
- 11.28%
- 10Y*
- 12.85%
SVAL vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SVAL iShares US Small Cap Value Factor ETF | 15.99% | 8.23% | 7.54% | 12.27% | -10.15% | 33.18% | 27.93% |
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 12.13% | 22.41% | 17.45% | 22.27% | -18.39% | 18.66% | 15.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between SVAL and ACWI is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2020 | 0.69 |
The correlation between SVAL and ACWI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
SVAL vs. ACWI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SVAL
ACWI
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Communication Services
Financial Services
SVAL
ACWI
Industrials
SVAL
ACWI
Consumer Cyclical
SVAL
ACWI
Technology
SVAL
ACWI
Healthcare
SVAL
ACWI
Energy
SVAL
ACWI
Basic Materials
SVAL
ACWI
Consumer Defensive
SVAL
ACWI
Utilities
SVAL
ACWI
Real Estate
SVAL
ACWI
Communication Services
SVAL
ACWI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SVAL vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank
SVAL
ACWI
SVAL vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares US Small Cap Value Factor ETF (SVAL) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SVAL | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.41 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.92 | 3.01 | +0.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.29 | 13.53 | -1.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SVAL | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.97 | 2.29 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.71 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 0.43 | +0.27 |
Drawdowns
SVAL vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SVAL drawdown since its inception was -27.44%, smaller than the maximum ACWI drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SVAL and ACWI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SVAL | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.44% | -56.00% | +28.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.94% | -9.73% | +0.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.44% | -16.55% | -10.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.44% | -26.42% | -1.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.51% | -0.83% | -0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.51% | -8.61% | +0.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.85% | 2.16% | +0.69% |
Volatility
SVAL vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison
iShares US Small Cap Value Factor ETF (SVAL) has a higher volatility of 4.31% compared to iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) at 3.93%. This indicates that SVAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SVAL | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.31% | 3.93% | +0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.62% | 10.29% | +1.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.87% | 12.78% | +5.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.33% | 16.05% | +6.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.27% | 17.11% | +6.16% |
SVAL vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison
SVAL has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
SVAL vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison
SVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, more than ACWI's 1.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 1.38% | 1.55% | 1.70% | 1.88% | 1.79% | 1.71% | 1.43% | 2.33% | 2.18% | 1.94% | 2.19% | 2.56% |
SVAL iShares US Small Cap Value Factor ETF | 2.27% | 2.33% | 1.82% | 2.25% | 2.09% | 2.33% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SVAL and ACWI have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SVAL has higher volatility (4.31%) compared to ACWI (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SVAL dropped -27.44% vs ACWI's -56.00%.
On 5-year performance, ACWI leads with 11.28% vs 6.47% for SVAL. On fees, SVAL is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ACWI has been the lower-risk option at 3.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ACWI has performed better with a 11.28% return vs 6.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SVAL is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ACWI.
SVAL has the higher dividend yield at 2.27%, compared with 1.38% for ACWI.
SVAL is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while ACWI is Global Equities. SVAL tracks Russell 2000 Focused Value Select Index, while ACWI tracks MSCI All Country World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SVAL and 0.32% for ACWI.
ACWI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SVAL and ACWI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer