SUSW.L vs. UC15.L
SUSW.L (iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) and UC15.L (UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) are both exchange-traded funds - SUSW.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while UC15.L is a Commodities fund tracking the UBS CMCI. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SUSW.L returned 10.52%/yr vs 12.62%/yr for UC15.L. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SUSW.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for UC15.L.
Performance
SUSW.L vs. UC15.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SUSW.L is traded in EUR, while UC15.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the UC15.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SUSW.L achieves a 11.31% return, which is significantly lower than UC15.L's 22.58% return.
SUSW.L
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 5.87%
- YTD
- 11.31%
- 6M
- 11.72%
- 1Y
- 18.68%
- 3Y*
- 12.95%
- 5Y*
- 10.52%
- 10Y*
- —
UC15.L
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- -1.10%
- YTD
- 22.58%
- 6M
- 23.28%
- 1Y
- 28.99%
- 3Y*
- 10.15%
- 5Y*
- 12.62%
- 10Y*
- 8.64%
SUSW.L vs. UC15.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SUSW.L iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | 11.31% | 1.89% | 18.34% | 20.78% | -16.40% | 35.65% | 10.76% | 32.32% | -3.09% | 2.02% |
UC15.L UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 22.58% | -2.78% | 11.57% | -4.53% | 23.27% | 44.96% | -7.78% | 12.01% | -6.42% | 1.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between SUSW.L and UC15.L is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2017 | 0.22 |
The correlation between SUSW.L and UC15.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SUSW.L vs. UC15.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SUSW.L
UC15.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Utilities
Energy
-
Technology
SUSW.L
UC15.L
Financial Services
SUSW.L
UC15.L
Industrials
SUSW.L
UC15.L
Healthcare
SUSW.L
UC15.L
Consumer Cyclical
SUSW.L
UC15.L
Communication Services
SUSW.L
UC15.L
Consumer Defensive
SUSW.L
UC15.L
Basic Materials
SUSW.L
UC15.L
Real Estate
SUSW.L
UC15.L
-
Utilities
SUSW.L
UC15.L
Energy
SUSW.L
-
UC15.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SUSW.L vs. UC15.L — Risk / Return Rank
SUSW.L
UC15.L
SUSW.L vs. UC15.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SUSW.L) and UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC15.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SUSW.L | UC15.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.33 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.35 | 4.27 | -1.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.66 | 9.93 | -1.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SUSW.L | UC15.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.50 | 1.87 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.83 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 0.32 | +0.44 |
Drawdowns
SUSW.L vs. UC15.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SUSW.L drawdown since its inception was -32.09%, smaller than the maximum UC15.L drawdown of -39.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUSW.L and UC15.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SUSW.L | UC15.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.09% | -39.67% | +7.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.80% | -6.76% | -1.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.13% | -14.73% | -6.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.13% | -17.58% | -3.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.15% | +3.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.93% | -14.34% | +9.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.14% | 2.91% | -0.77% |
Volatility
SUSW.L vs. UC15.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SUSW.L) is 3.49%, while UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC15.L) has a volatility of 5.13%. This indicates that SUSW.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UC15.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SUSW.L | UC15.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.49% | 5.13% | -1.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.12% | 12.51% | -3.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.26% | 15.47% | -3.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.61% | 15.19% | -0.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.23% | 14.81% | +1.42% |
SUSW.L vs. UC15.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SUSW.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than UC15.L's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
SUSW.L vs. UC15.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SUSW.L nor UC15.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SUSW.L and UC15.L have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SUSW.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SUSW.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for UC15.L.
SUSW.L is categorized as Global Equities, while UC15.L is Commodities. SUSW.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while UC15.L tracks UBS CMCI. They also come from different issuers: iShares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SUSW.L and 0.34% for UC15.L.
Find the right allocation for SUSW.L and UC15.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer