SUSL vs. PABU
SUSL (iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF) and PABU (iShares Paris-Aligned Climate Optimized MSCI USA ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SUSL is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Extended ESG Leaders Index, while PABU is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned Benchmark Extended Select PAB Index (USD). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SUSL returned 22.34%/yr vs 20.14%/yr for PABU. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.10% expense ratio.
Performance
SUSL vs. PABU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SUSL having a 9.27% return and PABU slightly higher at 9.39%.
SUSL
- 1D
- -0.94%
- 1M
- 4.53%
- YTD
- 9.27%
- 6M
- 10.06%
- 1Y
- 27.64%
- 3Y*
- 22.34%
- 5Y*
- 13.77%
- 10Y*
- —
PABU
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- 7.47%
- YTD
- 9.39%
- 6M
- 9.10%
- 1Y
- 23.78%
- 3Y*
- 20.14%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SUSL vs. PABU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SUSL iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF | 9.27% | 18.97% | 23.51% | 29.08% | -13.04% |
PABU iShares Paris-Aligned Climate Optimized MSCI USA ETF | 9.39% | 13.08% | 24.84% | 29.51% | -15.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between SUSL and PABU is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2022 | 0.93 |
The correlation between SUSL and PABU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
SUSL vs. PABU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SUSL
PABU
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Technology
SUSL
PABU
Communication Services
SUSL
PABU
Financial Services
SUSL
PABU
Healthcare
SUSL
PABU
Consumer Cyclical
SUSL
PABU
Industrials
SUSL
PABU
Consumer Defensive
SUSL
PABU
-
Real Estate
SUSL
PABU
Basic Materials
SUSL
PABU
Energy
SUSL
PABU
Utilities
SUSL
PABU
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SUSL vs. PABU — Risk / Return Rank
SUSL
PABU
SUSL vs. PABU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF (SUSL) and iShares Paris-Aligned Climate Optimized MSCI USA ETF (PABU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SUSL | PABU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.31 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.44 | 1.78 | +0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.49 | 6.25 | +4.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SUSL | PABU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.14 | 1.79 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 0.73 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
SUSL vs. PABU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SUSL drawdown since its inception was -34.26%, which is greater than PABU's maximum drawdown of -22.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUSL and PABU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SUSL | PABU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.26% | -22.76% | -11.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.37% | -13.40% | +2.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.91% | -20.85% | +0.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.38% | -1.29% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.70% | -5.63% | -0.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.64% | 3.82% | -1.18% |
Volatility
SUSL vs. PABU - Volatility Comparison
iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF (SUSL) and iShares Paris-Aligned Climate Optimized MSCI USA ETF (PABU) have volatilities of 3.68% and 3.70%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SUSL | PABU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.68% | 3.70% | -0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.98% | 10.24% | -0.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.98% | 13.37% | -0.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.48% | 18.68% | -1.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.80% | 18.68% | +1.12% |
SUSL vs. PABU - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SUSL and PABU have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SUSL vs. PABU - Dividend Comparison
SUSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, more than PABU's 0.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PABU iShares Paris-Aligned Climate Optimized MSCI USA ETF | 0.86% | 0.90% | 1.00% | 1.06% | 1.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SUSL iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF | 0.93% | 0.99% | 1.10% | 1.27% | 1.57% | 1.12% | 1.38% | 1.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, SUSL and PABU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
PABU has higher volatility (3.70%) compared to SUSL (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SUSL dropped -34.26% vs PABU's -22.76%.
On 3-year performance, SUSL leads with 22.34% vs 20.14% for PABU. Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SUSL has performed better with a 22.34% return vs 20.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SUSL and PABU have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.
SUSL has the higher dividend yield at 0.93%, compared with 0.86% for PABU.
SUSL is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while PABU is Large Cap Blend Equities. SUSL tracks MSCI USA Extended ESG Leaders Index, while PABU tracks MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned Benchmark Extended Select PAB Index (USD).
SUSL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SUSL and PABU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer