PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SUSC vs. IDMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SUSC vs. IDMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware USD Corporate Bond ETF (SUSC) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SUSC achieves a 0.58% return, which is significantly lower than IDMO's 8.19% return.


SUSC

1D
0.11%
1M
0.43%
YTD
0.58%
6M
0.55%
1Y
5.39%
3Y*
5.19%
5Y*
0.36%
10Y*

IDMO

1D
0.42%
1M
1.27%
YTD
8.19%
6M
12.09%
1Y
23.26%
3Y*
26.17%
5Y*
15.63%
10Y*
12.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SUSC vs. IDMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SUSC
iShares ESG Aware USD Corporate Bond ETF
0.58%7.57%1.91%8.58%-15.95%-1.57%9.57%14.43%-3.13%1.74%
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
8.19%42.17%12.79%20.16%-12.03%14.31%22.01%26.09%-16.66%11.24%

Correlation

The correlation between SUSC and IDMO is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2017

0.21

The correlation between SUSC and IDMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (all time) to 0.41 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SUSC vs. IDMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SUSC
SUSC Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
SUSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUSC Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
SUSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUSC Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

IDMO
IDMO Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
IDMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDMO Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
IDMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDMO Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SUSC vs. IDMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware USD Corporate Bond ETF (SUSC) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SUSCIDMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.26

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

1.90

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.84

7.89

-2.06

SUSC vs. IDMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SUSC Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is comparable to the IDMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUSC and IDMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SUSCIDMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

1.38

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

0.88

-0.83

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.45

-0.15

Drawdowns

SUSC vs. IDMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUSC drawdown since its inception was -22.42%, smaller than the maximum IDMO drawdown of -39.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUSC and IDMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SUSCIDMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.42%

-39.38%

+16.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.87%

-12.31%

+9.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.57%

-12.65%

+6.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.42%

-27.07%

+4.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.25%

-1.90%

+0.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.89%

-9.75%

+3.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

2.95%

-2.02%

Volatility

SUSC vs. IDMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares ESG Aware USD Corporate Bond ETF (SUSC) is 1.38%, while Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) has a volatility of 6.31%. This indicates that SUSC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SUSCIDMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.38%

6.31%

-4.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.21%

14.88%

-11.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.39%

16.88%

-12.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.19%

17.83%

-10.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.63%

18.11%

-10.48%

SUSC vs. IDMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SUSC has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than IDMO's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SUSC vs. IDMO - Dividend Comparison

SUSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.49%, more than IDMO's 3.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
3.52%3.71%2.24%2.89%3.66%1.81%1.63%2.78%3.27%3.08%2.18%2.52%
SUSC
iShares ESG Aware USD Corporate Bond ETF
4.49%4.37%4.34%3.83%2.97%2.21%2.19%3.07%3.33%1.33%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SUSC and IDMO have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDMO has higher volatility (6.31%) compared to SUSC (1.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SUSC dropped -22.42% vs IDMO's -39.38%.

On 5-year performance, IDMO leads with 15.63% vs 0.36% for SUSC. On fees, SUSC is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, SUSC has been the lower-risk option at 1.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IDMO has performed better with a 15.63% return vs 0.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SUSC is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IDMO.

SUSC has the higher dividend yield at 4.49%, compared with 3.52% for IDMO.

SUSC is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while IDMO is Momentum. SUSC tracks Bloomberg MSCI US Corporate ESG Focus Index, while IDMO tracks S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for SUSC and 0.25% for IDMO.

IDMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SUSC and IDMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer