SUSC vs. IBIT
SUSC (iShares ESG Aware USD Corporate Bond ETF) and IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SUSC is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg MSCI US Corporate ESG Focus Index, while IBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SUSC returned 5.87% vs -38.74% for IBIT. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SUSC charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IBIT.
Performance
SUSC vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SUSC achieves a 0.47% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -25.48% return.
SUSC
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- YTD
- 0.47%
- 6M
- 0.32%
- 1Y
- 5.87%
- 3Y*
- 5.09%
- 5Y*
- 0.34%
- 10Y*
- —
IBIT
- 1D
- -2.76%
- 1M
- -18.50%
- YTD
- -25.48%
- 6M
- -29.84%
- 1Y
- -38.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SUSC vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SUSC iShares ESG Aware USD Corporate Bond ETF | 0.47% | 7.57% | 2.42% |
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | -25.48% | -6.41% | 99.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between SUSC and IBIT is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SUSC vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank
SUSC
IBIT
SUSC vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware USD Corporate Bond ETF (SUSC) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SUSC | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 0.86 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.05 | -0.79 | +2.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.37 | -1.36 | +7.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SUSC | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.34 | -0.89 | +2.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.30 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
SUSC vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SUSC drawdown since its inception was -22.42%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -49.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUSC and IBIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SUSC | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.42% | -49.36% | +26.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.87% | -49.36% | +46.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.57% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.36% | -48.10% | +46.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.89% | -16.02% | +10.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.92% | 28.44% | -27.52% |
Volatility
SUSC vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares ESG Aware USD Corporate Bond ETF (SUSC) is 1.40%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 9.50%. This indicates that SUSC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SUSC | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.40% | 9.50% | -8.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.21% | 34.44% | -31.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.39% | 43.73% | -39.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.19% | 50.19% | -43.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.63% | 50.19% | -42.56% |
SUSC vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SUSC has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SUSC vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison
SUSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.49%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SUSC iShares ESG Aware USD Corporate Bond ETF | 4.49% | 4.37% | 4.34% | 3.83% | 2.97% | 2.21% | 2.19% | 3.07% | 3.33% | 1.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SUSC and IBIT have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBIT has higher volatility (9.50%) compared to SUSC (1.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SUSC dropped -22.42% vs IBIT's -49.36%.
On 1-year performance, SUSC leads with 5.87% vs -38.74% for IBIT. On fees, SUSC is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, SUSC has been the lower-risk option at 1.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SUSC has performed better with a 5.87% return vs -38.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SUSC is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IBIT.
SUSC has the higher dividend yield at 4.49%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.
SUSC is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. SUSC tracks Bloomberg MSCI US Corporate ESG Focus Index, while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for SUSC and 0.25% for IBIT.
SUSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SUSC and IBIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer