PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SUSB vs. VCSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SUSB vs. VCSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF (SUSB) and Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SUSB achieves a 0.68% return, which is significantly lower than VCSH's 0.79% return.


SUSB

1D
-0.08%
1M
-0.30%
6M
0.38%
YTD
0.68%
1Y
2.97%
3Y*
5.39%
5Y*
2.19%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.64%

VCSH

1D
-0.06%
1M
-0.22%
6M
0.39%
YTD
0.79%
1Y
3.07%
3Y*
5.46%
5Y*
2.30%
10Y*
2.64%
ALL TIME*
2.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.18M$4.00M$9.18M
$304.83M$291.45M$343.43M

SUSB vs. VCSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SUSB
iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF
0.68%6.81%4.83%5.98%-5.72%-0.76%4.96%7.02%0.54%0.28%
VCSH
Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF
0.79%6.77%4.91%6.20%-5.62%-0.63%5.13%7.02%0.92%0.19%

Correlation

The correlation between SUSB and VCSH is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2017

0.84

The correlation between SUSB and VCSH shifts across timeframes, from 0.84 (all time) to 0.96 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SUSB vs. VCSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SUSB
SUSB Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
SUSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUSB Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
SUSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUSB Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

VCSH
VCSH Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
VCSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCSH Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
VCSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCSH Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SUSB vs. VCSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF (SUSB) and Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SUSBVCSHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.36

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

2.61

-0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.20

10.26

-1.06

SUSB vs. VCSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SUSB Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the VCSH Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUSB and VCSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SUSB vs. VCSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUSB drawdown since its inception was -13.25%, roughly equal to the maximum VCSH drawdown of -12.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUSB and VCSH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SUSBVCSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.25%

-12.86%

-0.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.49%

-1.40%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.49%

-1.40%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.50%

-9.45%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

-0.29%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.56%

-0.96%

-0.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.38%

0.36%

+0.02%

Volatility

SUSB vs. VCSH - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF (SUSB) and Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH) have volatilities of 0.57% and 0.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SUSBVCSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.57%

0.55%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.59%

1.56%

+0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98%

1.94%

+0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.98%

2.90%

+0.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.70%

3.35%

+0.35%

SUSB vs. VCSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

SUSB has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than VCSH's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SUSB vs. VCSH - Dividend Comparison

SUSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, more than VCSH's 4.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SUSB
iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF
4.14%4.40%3.81%2.81%1.74%1.30%1.91%2.83%2.61%0.96%0.00%0.00%
VCSH
Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF
4.08%4.35%3.96%3.09%2.01%1.81%2.27%2.87%2.65%2.26%2.10%2.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, SUSB and VCSH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SUSB has higher volatility (0.57%) compared to VCSH (0.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SUSB dropped -13.25% vs VCSH's -12.86%.

On 5-year performance, VCSH leads with 2.30% vs 2.19% for SUSB. On fees, VCSH is cheaper at 0.04% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VCSH has performed better with a 2.30% return vs 2.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VCSH is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for SUSB.

SUSB has the higher dividend yield at 4.14%, compared with 4.08% for VCSH.

SUSB tracks Bloomberg Barclays MSCI US Corporate 1-5 Year ESG Focus Index, while VCSH tracks Bloomberg U.S. 1-5 Year Corporate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SUSB and 0.04% for VCSH.

VCSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SUSB and VCSH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer