PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SUSB vs. SCHI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SUSB vs. SCHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF (SUSB) and Schwab 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SUSB achieves a 0.68% return, which is significantly higher than SCHI's -0.64% return.


SUSB

1D
-0.08%
1M
-0.30%
6M
0.38%
YTD
0.68%
1Y
2.97%
3Y*
5.39%
5Y*
2.19%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.64%

SCHI

1D
-0.18%
1M
-1.31%
6M
-0.85%
YTD
-0.64%
1Y
2.20%
3Y*
5.81%
5Y*
0.68%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
1.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$42.16M$42.05M$59.83M
$4.18M$4.00M$9.18M

SUSB vs. SCHI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SUSB
iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF
0.68%6.81%4.83%5.98%-5.72%-0.76%4.96%0.42%
SCHI
Schwab 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF
-0.64%9.47%3.32%8.97%-14.06%-1.85%9.74%0.83%

Correlation

The correlation between SUSB and SCHI is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2019

0.84

The correlation between SUSB and SCHI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SUSB vs. SCHI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SUSB
SUSB Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
SUSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUSB Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
SUSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUSB Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHI
SCHI Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
SCHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHI Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHI Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SUSB vs. SCHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF (SUSB) and Schwab 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SUSBSCHIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.13

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

1.02

+1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.20

2.90

+6.31

SUSB vs. SCHI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SUSB Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is higher than the SCHI Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUSB and SCHI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SUSB vs. SCHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUSB drawdown since its inception was -13.25%, smaller than the maximum SCHI drawdown of -20.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUSB and SCHI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SUSBSCHIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.25%

-20.67%

+7.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.49%

-3.01%

+1.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.49%

-5.30%

+3.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.50%

-20.62%

+11.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

-2.18%

+1.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.56%

-5.61%

+4.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.38%

1.06%

-0.68%

Volatility

SUSB vs. SCHI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF (SUSB) is 0.57%, while Schwab 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHI) has a volatility of 1.12%. This indicates that SUSB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SUSBSCHIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.57%

1.12%

-0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.59%

3.31%

-1.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98%

4.13%

-2.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.98%

6.67%

-3.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.70%

7.34%

-3.64%

SUSB vs. SCHI - Expense Ratio Comparison

SUSB has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHI's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SUSB vs. SCHI - Dividend Comparison

SUSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, less than SCHI's 5.12% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHI
Schwab 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF
4.65%4.99%5.11%4.27%3.10%1.93%2.31%0.53%0.00%0.00%
SUSB
iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF
4.14%4.40%3.81%2.81%1.74%1.30%1.91%2.83%2.61%0.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


SUSB and SCHI have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHI has higher volatility (1.12%) compared to SUSB (0.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SUSB dropped -13.25% vs SCHI's -20.67%.

On 5-year performance, SUSB leads with 2.19% vs 0.68% for SCHI. On fees, SCHI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SUSB has been the lower-risk option at 0.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SUSB has performed better with a 2.19% return vs 0.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for SUSB.

SCHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.65%, compared with 4.14% for SUSB.

SUSB tracks Bloomberg Barclays MSCI US Corporate 1-5 Year ESG Focus Index, while SCHI tracks Bloomberg US 5-10 Year Corporate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SUSB and 0.03% for SCHI.

SUSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SUSB and SCHI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer