PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SUSB vs. HYGH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SUSB vs. HYGH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF (SUSB) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF (HYGH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SUSB achieves a 0.68% return, which is significantly lower than HYGH's 3.69% return.


SUSB

1D
-0.08%
1M
-0.30%
6M
0.38%
YTD
0.68%
1Y
2.97%
3Y*
5.39%
5Y*
2.19%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.64%

HYGH

1D
0.23%
1M
0.18%
6M
3.04%
YTD
3.69%
1Y
7.30%
3Y*
9.04%
5Y*
7.04%
10Y*
6.28%
ALL TIME*
4.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$5.51M$5.45M$4.91M
$4.18M$4.00M$9.18M

SUSB vs. HYGH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SUSB
iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF
0.68%6.81%4.83%5.98%-5.72%-0.76%4.96%7.02%0.54%0.28%
HYGH
iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF
3.69%6.94%11.22%12.17%-0.92%5.82%0.54%11.09%-0.85%1.85%

Correlation

The correlation between SUSB and HYGH is 0.12, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2017

0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SUSB vs. HYGH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SUSB
SUSB Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
SUSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUSB Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
SUSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUSB Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

HYGH
HYGH Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
HYGH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYGH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYGH Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
HYGH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYGH Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SUSB vs. HYGH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF (SUSB) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF (HYGH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SUSBHYGHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.35

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

4.24

-1.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.20

16.68

-7.48

SUSB vs. HYGH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SUSB Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the HYGH Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUSB and HYGH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SUSB vs. HYGH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUSB drawdown since its inception was -13.25%, smaller than the maximum HYGH drawdown of -23.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUSB and HYGH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SUSBHYGHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.25%

-23.88%

+10.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.49%

-1.62%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.49%

-8.06%

+6.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.50%

-8.24%

-1.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

-0.06%

-0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.56%

-2.20%

+0.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.38%

0.41%

-0.03%

Volatility

SUSB vs. HYGH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF (SUSB) is 0.57%, while iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF (HYGH) has a volatility of 0.63%. This indicates that SUSB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYGH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SUSBHYGHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.57%

0.63%

-0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.59%

2.77%

-1.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98%

3.64%

-1.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.98%

7.06%

-4.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.70%

8.21%

-4.51%

SUSB vs. HYGH - Expense Ratio Comparison

SUSB has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than HYGH's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

SUSB vs. HYGH - Dividend Comparison

SUSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, less than HYGH's 6.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYGH
iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF
6.56%6.86%7.85%8.95%6.21%3.74%4.06%4.89%6.45%4.79%4.60%5.75%
SUSB
iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF
4.14%4.40%3.81%2.81%1.74%1.30%1.91%2.83%2.61%0.96%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SUSB and HYGH have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HYGH has higher volatility (0.63%) compared to SUSB (0.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SUSB dropped -13.25% vs HYGH's -23.88%.

On 5-year performance, HYGH leads with 7.04% vs 2.19% for SUSB. On fees, SUSB is cheaper at 0.12% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, HYGH has performed better with a 7.04% return vs 2.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SUSB is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for HYGH.

HYGH has the higher dividend yield at 6.56%, compared with 4.14% for SUSB.

SUSB is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while HYGH is High Yield Bonds. SUSB tracks Bloomberg Barclays MSCI US Corporate 1-5 Year ESG Focus Index, while HYGH tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield Interest Hedged Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SUSB and 0.52% for HYGH.

HYGH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SUSB and HYGH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer