PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SUSB vs. DRSK
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SUSB vs. DRSK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF (SUSB) and Aptus Defined Risk ETF (DRSK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SUSB vs. DRSK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SUSB
iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF
0.04%6.81%4.83%5.98%-5.72%-0.76%4.96%7.02%0.76%
DRSK
Aptus Defined Risk ETF
-3.23%7.67%12.50%2.08%-9.57%0.88%13.80%12.64%2.40%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SUSB achieves a 0.04% return, which is significantly higher than DRSK's -3.23% return.


SUSB

1D
0.26%
1M
-0.87%
YTD
0.04%
6M
1.28%
1Y
4.85%
3Y*
5.31%
5Y*
2.24%
10Y*

DRSK

1D
0.66%
1M
-2.65%
YTD
-3.23%
6M
-3.42%
1Y
4.04%
3Y*
5.48%
5Y*
1.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SUSB vs. DRSK - Expense Ratio Comparison

SUSB has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than DRSK's 0.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SUSB vs. DRSK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SUSB
SUSB Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
SUSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUSB Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SUSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUSB Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

DRSK
DRSK Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
DRSK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRSK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRSK Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
DRSK Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRSK Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SUSB vs. DRSK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF (SUSB) and Aptus Defined Risk ETF (DRSK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SUSBDRSKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.12

0.50

+1.62

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.09

0.80

+2.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.09

+0.34

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.26

0.51

+2.75

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.63

1.39

+12.24

SUSB vs. DRSK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SUSB Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the DRSK Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUSB and DRSK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SUSBDRSKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

0.50

+1.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.24

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.69

+0.02

Correlation

The correlation between SUSB and DRSK is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

SUSB vs. DRSK - Dividend Comparison

SUSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.45%, more than DRSK's 3.89% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
SUSB
iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF
4.10%4.40%3.81%2.81%1.74%1.30%1.91%2.83%2.61%0.96%
DRSK
Aptus Defined Risk ETF
3.89%3.67%3.31%3.57%1.93%2.64%5.69%3.04%2.62%0.00%

Drawdowns

SUSB vs. DRSK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUSB drawdown since its inception was -13.25%, smaller than the maximum DRSK drawdown of -19.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUSB and DRSK.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SUSBDRSKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.25%

-19.87%

+6.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.49%

-7.20%

+5.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.57%

-19.87%

+10.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.87%

-6.28%

+5.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.60%

-4.26%

+2.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.36%

2.63%

-2.27%

Volatility

SUSB vs. DRSK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF (SUSB) is 0.93%, while Aptus Defined Risk ETF (DRSK) has a volatility of 1.74%. This indicates that SUSB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRSK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SUSBDRSKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.93%

1.74%

-0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.35%

5.46%

-4.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.29%

8.09%

-5.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.94%

7.22%

-4.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.75%

7.00%

-3.25%