SUSB vs. BSCP
SUSB (iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF) and BSCP (Invesco BulletShares 2025 Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds - SUSB tracks the Bloomberg Barclays MSCI US Corporate 1-5 Year ESG Focus Index while BSCP tracks the NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2025 Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SUSB charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for BSCP.
Performance
SUSB vs. BSCP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SUSB
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 0.65%
- 6M
- 0.89%
- 1Y
- 4.05%
- 3Y*
- 5.54%
- 5Y*
- 2.26%
- 10Y*
- —
BSCP
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SUSB vs. BSCP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SUSB iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF | 0.65% | 6.81% | 4.83% | 5.98% | -5.72% | -0.76% | 4.96% | 7.02% | 0.54% | 0.28% |
BSCP Invesco BulletShares 2025 Corporate Bond ETF | 0.00% | 4.19% | 5.06% | 5.11% | -5.99% | -1.37% | 8.10% | 12.76% | -1.90% | 1.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between SUSB and BSCP is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2017 | 0.59 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SUSB and BSCP has dropped to 0.00 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SUSB vs. BSCP — Risk / Return Rank
SUSB
BSCP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SUSB vs. BSCP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF (SUSB) and Invesco BulletShares 2025 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SUSB | BSCP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.74 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.98 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SUSB vs. BSCP - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SUSB | BSCP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.25% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.57% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.27% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.57% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.37% | — | — |
Volatility
SUSB vs. BSCP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SUSB | BSCP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.70% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.50% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.96% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.97% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.72% | — | — |
SUSB vs. BSCP - Expense Ratio Comparison
SUSB has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than BSCP's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SUSB vs. BSCP - Dividend Comparison
SUSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, more than BSCP's 1.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCP Invesco BulletShares 2025 Corporate Bond ETF | 1.92% | 3.99% | 3.96% | 3.39% | 2.24% | 1.93% | 2.42% | 3.12% | 3.26% | 2.93% | 2.94% | 0.75% |
SUSB iShares ESG 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF | 4.50% | 4.40% | 3.81% | 2.81% | 1.74% | 1.30% | 1.91% | 2.83% | 2.61% | 0.96% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SUSB and BSCP have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BSCP is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BSCP is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for SUSB.
SUSB has the higher dividend yield at 4.50%, compared with 1.92% for BSCP.
SUSB tracks Bloomberg Barclays MSCI US Corporate 1-5 Year ESG Focus Index, while BSCP tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2025 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SUSB and 0.10% for BSCP.
Find the right allocation for SUSB and BSCP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer