SUSA vs. OILK
SUSA (iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SUSA is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA ESG Select Index, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SUSA returned 11.86%/yr vs 17.73%/yr for OILK. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SUSA charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for OILK.
Performance
SUSA vs. OILK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SUSA achieves a 11.10% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 64.22% return.
SUSA
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- 6.04%
- YTD
- 11.10%
- 6M
- 10.68%
- 1Y
- 26.44%
- 3Y*
- 20.92%
- 5Y*
- 11.86%
- 10Y*
- 15.06%
OILK
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 64.22%
- 6M
- 60.70%
- 1Y
- 58.99%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 17.73%
- 10Y*
- —
SUSA vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SUSA iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF | 11.10% | 15.72% | 22.43% | 23.88% | -21.38% | 30.45% | 24.66% | 32.10% | -5.67% | 22.52% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 64.22% | -11.86% | 8.18% | -0.97% | 27.57% | 63.71% | -61.09% | 30.48% | -20.40% | 2.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between SUSA and OILK is -0.31, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2016 | 0.17 |
The correlation between SUSA and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.31 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SUSA vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SUSA
OILK
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Technology
SUSA
OILK
-
Financial Services
SUSA
OILK
-
Industrials
SUSA
OILK
-
Healthcare
SUSA
OILK
-
Communication Services
SUSA
OILK
-
Consumer Cyclical
SUSA
OILK
Energy
SUSA
OILK
-
Consumer Defensive
SUSA
OILK
-
Real Estate
SUSA
OILK
-
Basic Materials
SUSA
OILK
-
Utilities
SUSA
OILK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SUSA vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank
SUSA
OILK
SUSA vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF (SUSA) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SUSA | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.34 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.74 | 3.42 | -0.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.10 | 6.91 | +5.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SUSA | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.15 | 2.06 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.59 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.12 | +0.46 |
Drawdowns
SUSA vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SUSA drawdown since its inception was -53.93%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUSA and OILK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SUSA | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.93% | -83.76% | +29.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.71% | -17.35% | +7.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.30% | -23.42% | +4.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.23% | -34.69% | +6.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.93% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.88% | -3.66% | +2.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.25% | -32.61% | +25.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.19% | 8.56% | -6.37% |
Volatility
SUSA vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF (SUSA) is 3.29%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that SUSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SUSA | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.29% | 10.44% | -7.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.58% | 23.26% | -13.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.37% | 28.75% | -16.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.33% | 30.12% | -12.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.15% | 35.97% | -17.82% |
SUSA vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison
SUSA has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
SUSA vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison
SUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than OILK's 8.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 8.18% | 4.79% | 3.11% | 5.80% | 17.32% | 68.82% | 0.13% | 0.94% | 0.58% | 6.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SUSA iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF | 0.83% | 0.89% | 1.15% | 1.32% | 1.52% | 0.98% | 1.17% | 1.52% | 1.72% | 1.40% | 1.56% | 1.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SUSA and OILK have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OILK has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to SUSA (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SUSA dropped -53.93% vs OILK's -83.76%.
On 5-year performance, OILK leads with 17.73% vs 11.86% for SUSA. On fees, SUSA is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, SUSA has been the lower-risk option at 3.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, OILK has performed better with a 17.73% return vs 11.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SUSA is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for OILK.
OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 0.83% for SUSA.
SUSA is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while OILK is Oil & Gas. SUSA tracks MSCI USA ESG Select Index, while OILK tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for SUSA and 0.68% for OILK.
SUSA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SUSA and OILK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer