PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CIEN vs. CAMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CIEN vs. CAMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ciena Corporation (CIEN) and Camtek Ltd (CAMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIEN achieves a 96.83% return, which is significantly higher than CAMT's 84.04% return. Over the past 10 years, CIEN has underperformed CAMT with an annualized return of 37.46%, while CAMT has yielded a comparatively higher 58.72% annualized return.


CIEN

1D
7.50%
1M
-21.14%
YTD
96.83%
6M
94.44%
1Y
517.64%
3Y*
123.88%
5Y*
51.76%
10Y*
37.46%

CAMT

1D
0.29%
1M
16.94%
YTD
84.04%
6M
84.68%
1Y
164.67%
3Y*
84.24%
5Y*
40.79%
10Y*
58.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIEN vs. CAMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CIEN
Ciena Corporation
96.83%175.76%88.42%-11.71%-33.77%45.64%23.80%25.89%62.02%-14.26%
CAMT
Camtek Ltd
84.04%31.66%18.33%215.94%-52.30%110.13%102.31%63.19%20.41%77.72%

Correlation

The correlation between CIEN and CAMT is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2000

0.24

The correlation between CIEN and CAMT shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (all time) to 0.44 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CIEN:

$67.35B

CAMT:

$10.07B

EPS

CIEN:

$3.01

CAMT:

$0.98

PE Ratio

CIEN:

152.83

CAMT:

200.10

PS Ratio

CIEN:

12.03

CAMT:

19.27

PB Ratio

CIEN:

23.29

CAMT:

14.76

Total Revenue (TTM)

CIEN:

$5.57B

CAMT:

$499.09M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CIEN:

$2.40B

CAMT:

$250.68M

EBITDA (TTM)

CIEN:

$670.55M

CAMT:

$122.77M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CIEN vs. CAMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIEN
CIEN Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
CIEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIEN Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
CIEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIEN Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

CAMT
CAMT Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
CAMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAMT Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
CAMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAMT Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIEN vs. CAMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ciena Corporation (CIEN) and Camtek Ltd (CAMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CIENCAMTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+5.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.72

1.36

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

16.47

6.12

+10.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

66.89

14.87

+52.03

CIEN vs. CAMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIEN Sharpe Ratio is 7.73, which is higher than the CAMT Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIEN and CAMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CIEN vs. CAMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIEN drawdown since its inception was -99.51%, roughly equal to the maximum CAMT drawdown of -97.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIEN and CAMT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CIENCAMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.51%

-97.71%

-1.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.70%

-27.07%

-4.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.51%

-63.16%

+17.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.54%

-63.16%

+13.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.54%

-63.16%

+13.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-56.01%

-5.66%

-50.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-87.06%

-55.67%

-31.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.79%

11.12%

-3.33%

Volatility

CIEN vs. CAMT - Volatility Comparison

Ciena Corporation (CIEN) and Camtek Ltd (CAMT) have volatilities of 25.82% and 26.17%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CIENCAMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.82%

26.17%

-0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

55.30%

50.72%

+4.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

67.67%

64.36%

+3.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.83%

56.02%

-7.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.51%

52.11%

-7.60%

Dividends

CIEN vs. CAMT - Dividend Comparison

Neither CIEN nor CAMT has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CAMT
Camtek Ltd
0.00%0.00%1.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.57%2.07%2.45%
CIEN
Ciena Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

CIEN vs. CAMT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ciena Corporation and Camtek Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20222023202420252026
1.57B
121.66M
(CIEN) Total Revenue
(CAMT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CIEN vs. CAMT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ciena Corporation and Camtek Ltd over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%42.0%44.0%46.0%48.0%50.0%52.0%20222023202420252026
44.0%
50.1%
Portfolio components
CIEN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ciena Corporation reported a gross profit of 691.55M and revenue of 1.57B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.0%.

CAMT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Camtek Ltd reported a gross profit of 60.93M and revenue of 121.66M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.1%.

CIEN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ciena Corporation reported an operating income of 237.87M and revenue of 1.57B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.1%.

CAMT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Camtek Ltd reported an operating income of 27.27M and revenue of 121.66M, resulting in an operating margin of 22.4%.

CIEN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ciena Corporation reported a net income of 218.22M and revenue of 1.57B, resulting in a net margin of 13.9%.

CAMT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Camtek Ltd reported a net income of 31.65M and revenue of 121.66M, resulting in a net margin of 26.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CIEN and CAMT have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CAMT has higher volatility (26.17%) compared to CIEN (25.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIEN dropped -99.51% vs CAMT's -97.71%.

CIEN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.73 vs 2.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CIEN and CAMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer