SUPP vs. TOLZ
SUPP (TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF) and TOLZ (ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SUPP is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by TCW, while TOLZ is a Infrastructure Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure Composite Index. SUPP is actively managed, while TOLZ is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SUPP returned 14.03%/yr vs 14.11%/yr for TOLZ. Their 0.34 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SUPP charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for TOLZ.
Performance
SUPP vs. TOLZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SUPP achieves a 13.80% return, which is significantly higher than TOLZ's 12.26% return.
SUPP
- 1D
- 1.94%
- 1M
- -5.19%
- 6M
- 9.41%
- YTD
- 13.80%
- 1Y
- 15.25%
- 3Y*
- 14.03%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.23%
TOLZ
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 7.13%
- YTD
- 12.26%
- 1Y
- 15.76%
- 3Y*
- 14.11%
- 5Y*
- 8.83%
- 10Y*
- 7.50%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.71%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $10.33K | $10.54K | $22.91K | |
| $2.85M | $1.54M | $1.36M |
SUPP vs. TOLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SUPP TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF | 13.80% | 11.65% | 10.95% | 12.32% |
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF | 12.26% | 14.76% | 11.67% | 1.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between SUPP and TOLZ is 0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2023 | 0.34 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SUPP and TOLZ has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.34, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SUPP vs. TOLZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SUPP
TOLZ
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
SUPP
TOLZ
Technology
SUPP
TOLZ
Consumer Cyclical
SUPP
TOLZ
Basic Materials
SUPP
TOLZ
-
Communication Services
SUPP
-
TOLZ
-
Consumer Defensive
SUPP
-
TOLZ
Energy
SUPP
-
TOLZ
Financial Services
SUPP
-
TOLZ
Healthcare
SUPP
-
TOLZ
-
Real Estate
SUPP
-
TOLZ
Utilities
SUPP
-
TOLZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SUPP vs. TOLZ — Risk / Return Rank
SUPP
TOLZ
SUPP vs. TOLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF (SUPP) and ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SUPP | TOLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.27 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.94 | 3.20 | -2.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.36 | 8.87 | -5.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SUPP vs. TOLZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SUPP drawdown since its inception was -25.03%, smaller than the maximum TOLZ drawdown of -39.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUPP and TOLZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SUPP | TOLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.03% | -39.33% | +14.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.60% | -5.18% | -9.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.03% | -9.26% | -15.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.30% | -2.30% | -8.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.44% | -6.57% | +2.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.10% | 1.86% | +2.24% |
Volatility
SUPP vs. TOLZ - Volatility Comparison
TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF (SUPP) has a higher volatility of 8.12% compared to ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) at 3.58%. This indicates that SUPP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TOLZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SUPP | TOLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.12% | 3.58% | +4.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.94% | 8.79% | +11.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.83% | 10.70% | +12.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.23% | 14.03% | +6.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.23% | 16.23% | +4.00% |
SUPP vs. TOLZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SUPP has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than TOLZ's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
SUPP vs. TOLZ - Dividend Comparison
SUPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than TOLZ's 2.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SUPP TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF | 0.31% | 0.35% | 0.49% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF | 2.97% | 3.99% | 3.53% | 3.34% | 3.01% | 3.28% | 3.16% | 2.96% | 3.63% | 3.30% | 2.62% | 3.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SUPP and TOLZ have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SUPP has higher volatility (8.12%) compared to TOLZ (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SUPP dropped -25.03% vs TOLZ's -39.33%.
On 3-year performance, TOLZ leads with 14.11% vs 14.03% for SUPP. On fees, TOLZ is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, TOLZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, TOLZ has performed better with a 14.11% return vs 14.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TOLZ is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SUPP.
TOLZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.97%, compared with 0.31% for SUPP.
SUPP is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while TOLZ is Infrastructure Equities. They also come from different issuers: TCW and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SUPP and 0.46% for TOLZ.
TOLZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SUPP and TOLZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer