SUPL vs. FOWF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SUPL (ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF) and FOWF (Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds - SUPL tracks the FactSet Supply Chain Logistics Index - Benchmark TR Net while FOWF tracks the Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SUPL returned 27.72% vs 22.10% for FOWF. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SUPL charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for FOWF.

Performance

SUPL vs. FOWF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF (SUPL) and Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SUPL achieves a 18.07% return, which is significantly higher than FOWF's 9.44% return.

SUPL

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: 7.38%
• YTD: 18.07%
• 6M: 19.98%
• 1Y: 27.72%
• 3Y*: 11.71%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FOWF

• 1D: -1.88%
• 1M: 3.45%
• YTD: 9.44%
• 6M: 12.30%
• 1Y: 22.10%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SUPL vs. FOWF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SUPL ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF	18.07%	9.25%	-1.18%
FOWF Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF	9.44%	29.15%	0.39%

Correlation

The correlation between SUPL and FOWF is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024	0.56

The correlation between SUPL and FOWF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

SUPL vs. FOWF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SUPL	FOWF
Industrials	59.7%	62.2%
Energy	4.6%	-
Healthcare	3.4%	-
Utilities	3.3%	-
Technology	1.4%	29.2%
Basic Materials	-	0.8%
Communication Services	-	5.8%
Consumer Cyclical	-	2.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

SUPL vs. FOWF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SUPL

SUPL Risk / Return Rank: 52
SUPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
SUPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
SUPL Omega Ratio Rank: 49
SUPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
SUPL Martin Ratio Rank: 54

FOWF

FOWF Risk / Return Rank: 46
FOWF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
FOWF Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
FOWF Omega Ratio Rank: 44
FOWF Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
FOWF Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SUPL vs. FOWF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF (SUPL) and Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SUPL	FOWF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	1.59	+0.14
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.38	2.39	-0.01
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.28	+0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.85	2.20	+0.65
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.05	7.02	+2.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SUPL vs. FOWF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SUPL Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the FOWF Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUPL and FOWF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SUPL	FOWF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.73	1.59	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	1.63	-1.23

Drawdowns

SUPL vs. FOWF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUPL drawdown since its inception was -24.42%, which is greater than FOWF's maximum drawdown of -12.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUPL and FOWF.

Drawdown Indicators

	SUPL	FOWF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.42%	-12.29%	-12.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.76%	-10.08%	+0.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.71%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.30%	-2.81%	+2.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.97%	-2.05%	-3.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.07%	3.16%	-0.09%

Volatility

SUPL vs. FOWF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF (SUPL) is 4.15%, while Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF) has a volatility of 4.80%. This indicates that SUPL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FOWF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SUPL	FOWF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.15%	4.80%	-0.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.82%	11.62%	+1.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.09%	13.94%	+2.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.93%	16.89%	+2.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.93%	16.89%	+2.04%

SUPL vs. FOWF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SUPL has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than FOWF's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

SUPL vs. FOWF - Dividend Comparison

SUPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%, more than FOWF's 0.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
FOWF Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF	0.73%	0.79%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SUPL ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF	2.66%	3.03%	4.78%	4.71%	3.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SUPL and FOWF in my portfolio?

SUPL and FOWF have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SUPL or FOWF?

FOWF has higher volatility (4.80%) compared to SUPL (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SUPL dropped -24.42% vs FOWF's -12.29%.

Which ETF is better, SUPL or FOWF?

On 1-year performance, SUPL leads with 27.72% vs 22.10% for FOWF. On fees, FOWF is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, SUPL has been the lower-risk option at 4.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SUPL or FOWF?

Over the 1-year period, SUPL has performed better with a 27.72% return vs 22.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SUPL or FOWF?

FOWF is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for SUPL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SUPL or FOWF?

SUPL has the higher dividend yield at 2.66%, compared with 0.73% for FOWF.

What is the main difference between SUPL and FOWF?

SUPL tracks FactSet Supply Chain Logistics Index - Benchmark TR Net, while FOWF tracks Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for SUPL and 0.49% for FOWF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SUPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.