PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SUBC.OL vs. CMCL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SUBC.OL vs. CMCL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a NOK 10,000 investment in Subsea 7 S.A. (SUBC.OL) and Caledonia Mining Corporation plc (CMCL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SUBC.OL is traded in NOK, while CMCL.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CMCL.L values have been converted to NOK using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SUBC.OL achieves a 62.68% return, which is significantly higher than CMCL.L's -24.69% return. Over the past 10 years, SUBC.OL has underperformed CMCL.L with an annualized return of 19.26%, while CMCL.L has yielded a comparatively higher 21.82% annualized return.


SUBC.OL

1D
-1.24%
1M
-0.49%
YTD
62.68%
6M
68.31%
1Y
91.13%
3Y*
47.00%
5Y*
34.11%
10Y*
19.26%

CMCL.L

1D
-1.20%
1M
-2.61%
YTD
-24.69%
6M
-18.24%
1Y
14.49%
3Y*
15.69%
5Y*
13.27%
10Y*
21.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SUBC.OL vs. CMCL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SUBC.OL
Subsea 7 S.A.
62.68%21.45%25.84%35.57%81.19%-26.38%-16.30%26.21%-28.38%16.68%
CMCL.L
Caledonia Mining Corporation plc
-24.69%153.01%-9.79%6.88%21.58%-22.20%104.65%52.25%-11.00%33.16%

Correlation

The correlation between SUBC.OL and CMCL.L is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2007

-0.01

The correlation between SUBC.OL and CMCL.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (all time) to 0.10 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SUBC.OL vs. CMCL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SUBC.OL
SUBC.OL Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
SUBC.OL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUBC.OL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUBC.OL Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
SUBC.OL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUBC.OL Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

CMCL.L
CMCL.L Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
CMCL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMCL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMCL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
CMCL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMCL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SUBC.OL vs. CMCL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Subsea 7 S.A. (SUBC.OL) and Caledonia Mining Corporation plc (CMCL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SUBC.OLCMCL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.10

+0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.20

0.30

+7.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.99

0.54

+19.44

SUBC.OL vs. CMCL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SUBC.OL Sharpe Ratio is 3.22, which is higher than the CMCL.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUBC.OL and CMCL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SUBC.OLCMCL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.22

0.26

+2.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.02

0.33

+0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.54

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.21

-0.05

Drawdowns

SUBC.OL vs. CMCL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUBC.OL drawdown since its inception was -95.59%, which is greater than CMCL.L's maximum drawdown of -76.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUBC.OL and CMCL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SUBC.OLCMCL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.59%

-76.61%

-18.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.30%

-47.74%

+36.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.69%

-47.74%

+14.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.80%

-47.74%

+13.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.34%

-53.79%

-16.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.57%

-47.74%

+43.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.61%

-32.54%

-5.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.61%

26.58%

-21.97%

Volatility

SUBC.OL vs. CMCL.L - Volatility Comparison

Subsea 7 S.A. (SUBC.OL) has a higher volatility of 12.36% compared to Caledonia Mining Corporation plc (CMCL.L) at 10.14%. This indicates that SUBC.OL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMCL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SUBC.OLCMCL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.36%

10.14%

+2.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.32%

42.02%

-17.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.79%

55.39%

-26.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.56%

39.66%

-6.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.97%

40.07%

-3.10%

Dividends

SUBC.OL vs. CMCL.L - Dividend Comparison

SUBC.OL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.13%, more than CMCL.L's 2.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMCL.L
Caledonia Mining Corporation plc
2.63%2.12%5.45%4.26%3.99%4.18%2.07%3.37%4.67%4.02%4.49%8.45%
SUBC.OL
Subsea 7 S.A.
6.13%6.40%3.33%2.70%0.88%3.17%0.00%1.43%5.93%4.07%0.00%0.00%

Financials

SUBC.OL vs. CMCL.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Subsea 7 S.A. and Caledonia Mining Corporation plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. SUBC.OL values in NOK, CMCL.L values in GBp

Frequently Asked Questions


SUBC.OL and CMCL.L have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SUBC.OL and CMCL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer