PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMCL.L vs. UAMY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CMCL.L vs. UAMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Caledonia Mining Corporation plc (CMCL.L) and United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CMCL.L is traded in GBp, while UAMY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the UAMY values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMCL.L achieves a -18.57% return, which is significantly lower than UAMY's 73.01% return. Over the past 10 years, CMCL.L has underperformed UAMY with an annualized return of 21.07%, while UAMY has yielded a comparatively higher 43.42% annualized return.


CMCL.L

1D
-1.55%
1M
-2.77%
YTD
-18.57%
6M
-12.34%
1Y
24.73%
3Y*
19.18%
5Y*
11.77%
10Y*
21.07%

UAMY

1D
-5.57%
1M
-21.71%
YTD
73.01%
6M
40.36%
1Y
217.59%
3Y*
189.62%
5Y*
56.94%
10Y*
43.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMCL.L vs. UAMY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CMCL.L
Caledonia Mining Corporation plc
-18.57%165.67%-18.06%-2.41%22.62%-23.46%103.30%44.28%-10.71%27.90%
UAMY
United States Antimony Corporation
73.01%163.41%623.26%-51.42%9.44%-3.73%31.60%-36.15%92.00%16.47%

Correlation

The correlation between CMCL.L and UAMY is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2007

0.02

The correlation between CMCL.L and UAMY shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (all time) to 0.16 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CMCL.L:

£314.08M

UAMY:

$1.22B

EPS

CMCL.L:

£3.15

UAMY:

-$0.13

PS Ratio

CMCL.L:

1.14

UAMY:

28.57

PB Ratio

CMCL.L:

1.16

UAMY:

9.29

Total Revenue (TTM)

CMCL.L:

£273.91M

UAMY:

$39.04M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CMCL.L:

£142.17M

UAMY:

$4.34M

EBITDA (TTM)

CMCL.L:

£136.85M

UAMY:

-$15.23M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMCL.L vs. UAMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMCL.L
CMCL.L Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
CMCL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMCL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMCL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
CMCL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMCL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

UAMY
UAMY Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
UAMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UAMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
UAMY Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
UAMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
UAMY Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMCL.L vs. UAMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Caledonia Mining Corporation plc (CMCL.L) and United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CMCL.LUAMYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.28

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.55

2.94

-2.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.97

5.10

-4.12

CMCL.L vs. UAMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMCL.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the UAMY Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMCL.L and UAMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CMCL.LUAMYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

1.67

-1.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.61

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.43

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.14

+0.06

Drawdowns

CMCL.L vs. UAMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMCL.L drawdown since its inception was -78.50%, smaller than the maximum UAMY drawdown of -96.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMCL.L and UAMY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMCL.LUAMYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.50%

-96.21%

+17.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-44.42%

-74.42%

+30.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.42%

-74.42%

+30.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.81%

-78.57%

+33.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.39%

-88.52%

+32.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-44.42%

-50.86%

+6.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.13%

-66.16%

+30.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.30%

42.88%

-17.58%

Volatility

CMCL.L vs. UAMY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Caledonia Mining Corporation plc (CMCL.L) is 9.87%, while United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) has a volatility of 31.95%. This indicates that CMCL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UAMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMCL.LUAMYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.87%

31.95%

-22.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.10%

91.21%

-49.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.58%

131.07%

-75.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.07%

94.06%

-54.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.64%

100.66%

-61.02%

Dividends

CMCL.L vs. UAMY - Dividend Comparison

CMCL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%, while UAMY has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMCL.L
Caledonia Mining Corporation plc
2.63%2.12%5.45%4.26%3.99%4.18%2.07%3.37%4.67%4.02%4.49%8.45%
UAMY
United States Antimony Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

CMCL.L vs. UAMY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Caledonia Mining Corporation plc and United States Antimony Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00M40.00M60.00M80.00M20222023202420252026
66.26M
6.78M
(CMCL.L) Total Revenue
(UAMY) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. CMCL.L values in GBp, UAMY values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


CMCL.L and UAMY have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMCL.L and UAMY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer