SUAP.L vs. ISAC.L
SUAP.L (iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)) and ISAC.L (iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Global Equities funds from iShares - SUAP.L tracks the iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) while ISAC.L tracks the MSCI All Country World Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SUAP.L returned 9.38%/yr vs 11.51%/yr for ISAC.L. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SUAP.L charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ISAC.L.
Performance
SUAP.L vs. ISAC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SUAP.L is traded in GBP, while ISAC.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ISAC.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SUAP.L achieves a 13.09% return, which is significantly higher than ISAC.L's 10.73% return.
SUAP.L
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- -1.84%
- 6M
- 11.30%
- YTD
- 13.09%
- 1Y
- 20.13%
- 3Y*
- 14.19%
- 5Y*
- 9.38%
- 10Y*
- —
ISAC.L
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- -1.47%
- 6M
- 9.00%
- YTD
- 10.73%
- 1Y
- 22.42%
- 3Y*
- 17.72%
- 5Y*
- 11.51%
- 10Y*
- 12.14%
SUAP.L vs. ISAC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SUAP.L iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 13.09% | 10.67% | 13.28% | 22.38% | -20.64% | 18.23% |
ISAC.L iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 10.73% | 13.64% | 19.87% | 16.44% | -8.43% | 13.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between SUAP.L and ISAC.L is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2021 | 0.76 |
The correlation between SUAP.L and ISAC.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SUAP.L vs. ISAC.L — Risk / Return Rank
SUAP.L
ISAC.L
SUAP.L vs. ISAC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (SUAP.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SUAP.L | ISAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.33 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.39 | 3.25 | -0.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.99 | 11.85 | -2.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SUAP.L vs. ISAC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SUAP.L drawdown since its inception was -27.13%, roughly equal to the maximum ISAC.L drawdown of -25.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUAP.L and ISAC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SUAP.L | ISAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.13% | -25.84% | -1.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.76% | -6.88% | -1.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.71% | -18.33% | -1.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.13% | -18.33% | -8.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.78% | -2.45% | -0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.07% | -3.51% | -3.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.34% | 1.89% | +0.45% |
Volatility
SUAP.L vs. ISAC.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (SUAP.L) has a higher volatility of 4.49% compared to iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L) at 3.31%. This indicates that SUAP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISAC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SUAP.L | ISAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.49% | 3.31% | +1.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.07% | 10.05% | +1.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.59% | 12.43% | +1.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.64% | 14.39% | +2.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.44% | 15.40% | +1.04% |
SUAP.L vs. ISAC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SUAP.L has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than ISAC.L's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
SUAP.L vs. ISAC.L - Dividend Comparison
SUAP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, while ISAC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISAC.L iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SUAP.L iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 0.89% | 0.92% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 1.42% | 0.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SUAP.L and ISAC.L have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ISAC.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ISAC.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for SUAP.L.
SUAP.L tracks iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist), while ISAC.L tracks MSCI All Country World Index (Net). Their fees differ too: 1.00% for SUAP.L and 0.20% for ISAC.L.
Find the right allocation for SUAP.L and ISAC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer