SUAP.L vs. FSWD.L
SUAP.L (iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)) and FSWD.L (iShares STOXX World Equity Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - SUAP.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuel Net Index (USD), while FSWD.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the STOXX Developed World Equity Factor Screened Net Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SUAP.L returned 9.10%/yr vs 11.51%/yr for FSWD.L. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SUAP.L charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for FSWD.L.
Performance
SUAP.L vs. FSWD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SUAP.L is traded in GBP, while FSWD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FSWD.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SUAP.L having a 12.06% return and FSWD.L slightly higher at 12.41%.
SUAP.L
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -2.30%
- 6M
- 10.61%
- YTD
- 12.06%
- 1Y
- 18.49%
- 3Y*
- 13.49%
- 5Y*
- 9.10%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.70%
FSWD.L
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -1.09%
- 6M
- 12.68%
- YTD
- 12.41%
- 1Y
- 25.03%
- 3Y*
- 17.81%
- 5Y*
- 11.51%
- 10Y*
- 11.41%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.31%
SUAP.L vs. FSWD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SUAP.L iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 12.06% | 10.67% | 13.28% | 22.38% | -20.64% | 18.23% |
FSWD.L iShares STOXX World Equity Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 12.41% | 17.16% | 18.87% | 9.04% | -5.40% | 12.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between SUAP.L and FSWD.L is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2021 | 0.72 |
The correlation between SUAP.L and FSWD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
SUAP.L vs. FSWD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SUAP.L
FSWD.L
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Energy
-
Technology
SUAP.L
FSWD.L
Financial Services
SUAP.L
FSWD.L
Consumer Cyclical
SUAP.L
FSWD.L
Healthcare
SUAP.L
FSWD.L
Industrials
SUAP.L
FSWD.L
Communication Services
SUAP.L
FSWD.L
Consumer Defensive
SUAP.L
FSWD.L
Real Estate
SUAP.L
FSWD.L
Basic Materials
SUAP.L
FSWD.L
Utilities
SUAP.L
FSWD.L
Energy
SUAP.L
-
FSWD.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SUAP.L vs. FSWD.L — Risk / Return Rank
SUAP.L
FSWD.L
SUAP.L vs. FSWD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (SUAP.L) and iShares STOXX World Equity Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FSWD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SUAP.L | FSWD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.41 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.10 | 4.22 | -2.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.83 | 16.18 | -8.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SUAP.L vs. FSWD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SUAP.L drawdown since its inception was -27.13%, smaller than the maximum FSWD.L drawdown of -37.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUAP.L and FSWD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SUAP.L | FSWD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.13% | -37.43% | +10.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.76% | -5.90% | -2.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.71% | -19.93% | +0.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.13% | -19.93% | -7.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.66% | -1.15% | -2.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.07% | -7.38% | +0.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.36% | 1.54% | +0.82% |
Volatility
SUAP.L vs. FSWD.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (SUAP.L) has a higher volatility of 4.55% compared to iShares STOXX World Equity Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FSWD.L) at 2.87%. This indicates that SUAP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSWD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SUAP.L | FSWD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.55% | 2.87% | +1.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.02% | 8.21% | +2.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.58% | 10.88% | +2.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.62% | 18.84% | -2.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.43% | 17.41% | -0.98% |
SUAP.L vs. FSWD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SUAP.L has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than FSWD.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
SUAP.L vs. FSWD.L - Dividend Comparison
SUAP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, while FSWD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSWD.L iShares STOXX World Equity Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SUAP.L iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 0.90% | 0.92% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 1.42% | 0.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SUAP.L and FSWD.L have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SUAP.L is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SUAP.L is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for FSWD.L.
SUAP.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FSWD.L is Global Equities. SUAP.L tracks MSCI USA SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuel Net Index (USD), while FSWD.L tracks STOXX Developed World Equity Factor Screened Net Index. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for SUAP.L and 0.30% for FSWD.L.
Find the right allocation for SUAP.L and FSWD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer