FSWD.L vs. MOGB.L
FSWD.L (iShares STOXX World Equity Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and MOGB.L (VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FSWD.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the STOXX Developed World Equity Factor Screened Net Index, while MOGB.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FSWD.L returned 11.49%/yr vs 7.47%/yr for MOGB.L. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FSWD.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for MOGB.L.
Performance
FSWD.L vs. MOGB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FSWD.L is traded in GBp, while MOGB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the MOGB.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSWD.L achieves a 12.10% return, which is significantly higher than MOGB.L's 0.40% return. Over the past 10 years, FSWD.L has outperformed MOGB.L with an annualized return of 11.49%, while MOGB.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.47% annualized return.
FSWD.L
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- -0.61%
- 6M
- 10.73%
- YTD
- 12.10%
- 1Y
- 24.41%
- 3Y*
- 18.45%
- 5Y*
- 11.68%
- 10Y*
- 11.49%
MOGB.L
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 3.20%
- 6M
- -1.70%
- YTD
- 0.40%
- 1Y
- 7.29%
- 3Y*
- 6.56%
- 5Y*
- 4.24%
- 10Y*
- 7.47%
FSWD.L vs. MOGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSWD.L iShares STOXX World Equity Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 12.10% | 17.16% | 18.87% | 9.04% | -5.40% | 22.11% | 6.89% | 17.63% | -7.35% | 15.20% |
MOGB.L VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF | 0.40% | 0.00% | 12.94% | 11.88% | -9.07% | 27.24% | 9.78% | 29.63% | 4.63% | -9.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSWD.L and MOGB.L is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2015 | 0.74 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FSWD.L and MOGB.L has dropped to 0.54 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSWD.L vs. MOGB.L — Risk / Return Rank
FSWD.L
MOGB.L
FSWD.L vs. MOGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares STOXX World Equity Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FSWD.L) and VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF (MOGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSWD.L | MOGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.11 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.12 | 0.66 | +3.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.80 | 1.52 | +14.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSWD.L vs. MOGB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSWD.L drawdown since its inception was -37.43%, which is greater than MOGB.L's maximum drawdown of -26.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSWD.L and MOGB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSWD.L | MOGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.43% | -26.42% | -11.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.90% | -11.01% | +5.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.93% | -22.73% | +2.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.93% | -22.73% | +2.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.27% | -26.42% | +0.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.42% | -3.99% | +2.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.38% | -7.83% | +0.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.54% | 4.79% | -3.25% |
Volatility
FSWD.L vs. MOGB.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares STOXX World Equity Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FSWD.L) is 2.86%, while VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF (MOGB.L) has a volatility of 5.12%. This indicates that FSWD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MOGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSWD.L | MOGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.86% | 5.12% | -2.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.36% | 9.63% | -1.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.94% | 12.58% | -1.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.86% | 20.04% | -1.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.40% | 22.72% | -5.32% |
FSWD.L vs. MOGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSWD.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than MOGB.L's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSWD.L vs. MOGB.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither FSWD.L nor MOGB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FSWD.L and MOGB.L have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FSWD.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FSWD.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for MOGB.L.
FSWD.L is categorized as Global Equities, while MOGB.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. FSWD.L tracks STOXX Developed World Equity Factor Screened Net Index, while MOGB.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for FSWD.L and 0.49% for MOGB.L.
Find the right allocation for FSWD.L and MOGB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer