SUA0.DE vs. IS3N.DE
SUA0.DE (iShares EUR Corporate Bond ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc) and IS3N.DE (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - SUA0.DE is a European Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg MSCI Euro Corporate Sustainable and SRI, while IS3N.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SUA0.DE returned 4.49%/yr vs 19.99%/yr for IS3N.DE. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SUA0.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IS3N.DE.
Performance
SUA0.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SUA0.DE achieves a 0.43% return, which is significantly lower than IS3N.DE's 25.82% return.
SUA0.DE
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 0.43%
- 6M
- 0.46%
- 1Y
- 2.02%
- 3Y*
- 4.49%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IS3N.DE
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- 3.11%
- YTD
- 25.82%
- 6M
- 26.34%
- 1Y
- 45.77%
- 3Y*
- 19.99%
- 5Y*
- 8.61%
- 10Y*
- 10.00%
SUA0.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SUA0.DE iShares EUR Corporate Bond ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc | 0.43% | 3.04% | 4.19% | 7.35% | -5.92% |
IS3N.DE iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 25.82% | 17.14% | 13.87% | 7.20% | -10.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between SUA0.DE and IS3N.DE is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2022 | 0.21 |
The correlation between SUA0.DE and IS3N.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (all time) to 0.37 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SUA0.DE vs. IS3N.DE — Risk / Return Rank
SUA0.DE
IS3N.DE
SUA0.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares EUR Corporate Bond ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc (SUA0.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SUA0.DE | IS3N.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.49 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.65 | 4.42 | -3.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.19 | 16.00 | -13.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SUA0.DE | IS3N.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 | 2.69 | -2.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.44 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
SUA0.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SUA0.DE drawdown since its inception was -9.07%, smaller than the maximum IS3N.DE drawdown of -35.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUA0.DE and IS3N.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SUA0.DE | IS3N.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.07% | -35.06% | +25.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.58% | -10.52% | +7.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.58% | -19.17% | +16.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.74% | -2.49% | +1.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.20% | -9.30% | +7.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.77% | 2.91% | -2.14% |
Volatility
SUA0.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares EUR Corporate Bond ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc (SUA0.DE) is 1.19%, while iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE) has a volatility of 7.16%. This indicates that SUA0.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IS3N.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SUA0.DE | IS3N.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.19% | 7.16% | -5.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.57% | 14.69% | -12.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.07% | 17.32% | -14.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.57% | 16.19% | -11.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.57% | 18.04% | -13.47% |
SUA0.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SUA0.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IS3N.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SUA0.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither SUA0.DE nor IS3N.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SUA0.DE and IS3N.DE have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SUA0.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SUA0.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IS3N.DE.
SUA0.DE is categorized as European Corporate Bonds, while IS3N.DE is Emerging Markets Equities. SUA0.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Euro Corporate Sustainable and SRI, while IS3N.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI). Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SUA0.DE and 0.18% for IS3N.DE.
Find the right allocation for SUA0.DE and IS3N.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer