SU vs. SCYB
SU (Suncor Energy Inc.) is a stock, while SCYB (Schwab High Yield Bond ETF) is High Yield Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index. Over the past 3 years, SU returned 34.61%/yr vs 8.33%/yr for SCYB. Their 0.09 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
SU vs. SCYB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SU achieves a 50.88% return, which is significantly higher than SCYB's 2.09% return.
SU
- 1D
- -1.93%
- 1M
- 19.85%
- 6M
- 27.10%
- YTD
- 50.88%
- 1Y
- 74.91%
- 3Y*
- 34.61%
- 5Y*
- 33.88%
- 10Y*
- 14.16%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.29%
SCYB
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- 6M
- 1.26%
- YTD
- 2.09%
- 1Y
- 5.64%
- 3Y*
- 8.33%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.48%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $26.62M | $28.32M | $31.29M | |
| $233.05M | $239.36M | $261.23M |
SU vs. SCYB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SU Suncor Energy Inc. | 50.88% | 29.69% | 16.22% | 12.67% |
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF | 2.09% | 8.33% | 8.15% | 7.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between SU and SCYB is -0.12, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2023 | 0.09 |
The correlation between SU and SCYB shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SU vs. SCYB — Risk / Return Rank
SU
SCYB
SU vs. SCYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Suncor Energy Inc. (SU) and Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SU | SCYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.29 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.32 | 2.32 | +1.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.12 | 10.11 | +1.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SU vs. SCYB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SU drawdown since its inception was -80.22%, which is greater than SCYB's maximum drawdown of -4.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SU and SCYB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SU | SCYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.22% | -4.92% | -75.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.67% | -2.44% | -20.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.67% | -4.92% | -17.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.75% | -0.25% | -4.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.35% | -0.50% | -26.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.76% | 0.56% | +6.20% |
Volatility
SU vs. SCYB - Volatility Comparison
Suncor Energy Inc. (SU) has a higher volatility of 8.71% compared to Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB) at 0.76%. This indicates that SU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCYB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SU | SCYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.71% | 0.76% | +7.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.35% | 3.04% | +18.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.83% | 3.76% | +22.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.77% | 5.04% | +27.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.96% | 5.04% | +31.92% |
Dividends
SU vs. SCYB - Dividend Comparison
SU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, less than SCYB's 6.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF | 6.93% | 6.99% | 7.06% | 3.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SU Suncor Energy Inc. | 2.60% | 3.72% | 4.51% | 5.27% | 4.56% | 3.34% | 4.93% | 3.84% | 4.24% | 4.16% | 3.55% | 4.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SU and SCYB have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SU has higher volatility (8.71%) compared to SCYB (0.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SU dropped -80.22% vs SCYB's -4.92%.
SU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SU and SCYB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer