SU vs. CVE.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Suncor Energy Inc. (SU) and Cenovus Energy Inc. (CVE.TO).
Performance
SU vs. CVE.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SU vs. CVE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SU Suncor Energy Inc. | 50.18% | 29.69% | 16.22% | 6.40% | 32.31% | 54.94% | -46.67% | 22.10% | -21.27% | 17.86% |
CVE.TO Cenovus Energy Inc. | 57.95% | 15.82% | -5.93% | -12.11% | 60.90% | 103.04% | -39.19% | 46.98% | -21.49% | -38.55% |
Different Trading Currencies
SU is traded in USD, while CVE.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the CVE.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Fundamentals
SU:
$79.40B
CVE.TO:
CA$68.82B
SU:
$4.88
CVE.TO:
CA$2.15
SU:
13.55
CVE.TO:
17.15
SU:
0.49
CVE.TO:
0.07
SU:
1.61
CVE.TO:
1.36
SU:
1.76
CVE.TO:
2.18
SU:
$49.66B
CVE.TO:
CA$49.70B
SU:
$21.23B
CVE.TO:
CA$6.58B
SU:
$16.17B
CVE.TO:
CA$10.20B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SU achieves a 50.18% return, which is significantly lower than CVE.TO's 57.95% return. Over the past 10 years, SU has outperformed CVE.TO with an annualized return of 13.77%, while CVE.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 9.76% annualized return.
SU
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 17.87%
- YTD
- 50.18%
- 6M
- 60.92%
- 1Y
- 77.54%
- 3Y*
- 34.52%
- 5Y*
- 30.72%
- 10Y*
- 13.77%
CVE.TO
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 19.97%
- YTD
- 57.95%
- 6M
- 58.69%
- 1Y
- 97.43%
- 3Y*
- 18.73%
- 5Y*
- 30.74%
- 10Y*
- 9.76%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SU vs. CVE.TO — Risk / Return Rank
SU
CVE.TO
SU vs. CVE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Suncor Energy Inc. (SU) and Cenovus Energy Inc. (CVE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SU | CVE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.90 | 2.41 | +0.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.39 | 2.88 | +0.52 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.39 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.09 | 4.02 | +0.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.86 | 14.99 | -1.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SU | CVE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.90 | 2.41 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 | 0.76 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | 0.19 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.06 | +0.37 |
Correlation
The correlation between SU and CVE.TO is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SU vs. CVE.TO - Dividend Comparison
SU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, more than CVE.TO's 2.17% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SU Suncor Energy Inc. | 2.57% | 3.72% | 4.51% | 5.27% | 4.56% | 3.34% | 4.93% | 3.84% | 4.24% | 4.16% | 3.55% | 4.42% |
CVE.TO Cenovus Energy Inc. | 2.17% | 3.36% | 3.74% | 2.38% | 1.77% | 0.57% | 0.81% | 1.61% | 2.08% | 1.74% | 0.99% | 4.87% |
Drawdowns
SU vs. CVE.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SU drawdown since its inception was -80.22%, smaller than the maximum CVE.TO drawdown of -95.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SU and CVE.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SU | CVE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.22% | -92.84% | +12.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.40% | -24.71% | +5.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.58% | -47.23% | +10.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.54% | -88.58% | +15.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.83% | -0.83% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.55% | -34.93% | +7.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.72% | 7.44% | -1.72% |
Volatility
SU vs. CVE.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Suncor Energy Inc. (SU) is 5.32%, while Cenovus Energy Inc. (CVE.TO) has a volatility of 8.74%. This indicates that SU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CVE.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SU | CVE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.32% | 8.74% | -3.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.05% | 24.14% | -9.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.93% | 40.66% | -13.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.89% | 40.58% | -7.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.86% | 50.46% | -13.60% |
Financials
SU vs. CVE.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Suncor Energy Inc. and Cenovus Energy Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SU vs. CVE.TO - Profitability Comparison
SU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Suncor Energy Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.83B and revenue of 12.03B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.5%.
CVE.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cenovus Energy Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.32B and revenue of 10.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.1%.
SU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Suncor Energy Inc. reported an operating income of -35.52M and revenue of 12.03B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.3%.
CVE.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cenovus Energy Inc. reported an operating income of 1.08B and revenue of 10.88B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.9%.
SU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Suncor Energy Inc. reported a net income of 1.47B and revenue of 12.03B, resulting in a net margin of 12.3%.
CVE.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cenovus Energy Inc. reported a net income of 934.00M and revenue of 10.88B, resulting in a net margin of 8.6%.