PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STZ vs. HAIN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

STZ vs. HAIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) and The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (HAIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STZ achieves a -0.56% return, which is significantly higher than HAIN's -24.72% return. Over the past 10 years, STZ has outperformed HAIN with an annualized return of 0.32%, while HAIN has yielded a comparatively lower -33.76% annualized return.


STZ

1D
-0.99%
1M
-8.60%
YTD
-0.56%
6M
-0.64%
1Y
-21.28%
3Y*
-16.29%
5Y*
-9.16%
10Y*
0.32%

HAIN

1D
-0.85%
1M
26.97%
YTD
-24.72%
6M
-24.72%
1Y
-54.75%
3Y*
-59.49%
5Y*
-54.35%
10Y*
-33.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STZ vs. HAIN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
-0.56%-35.99%-7.11%5.83%-6.43%16.12%17.41%19.85%-28.73%50.69%
HAIN
The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.
-24.72%-82.60%-43.84%-32.32%-62.03%6.13%54.69%63.65%-62.59%8.61%

Correlation

The correlation between STZ and HAIN is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 1994

0.21

The correlation between STZ and HAIN shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.25 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

STZ:

$23.52B

HAIN:

$73.29M

EPS

STZ:

$11.23

HAIN:

-$5.71

PS Ratio

STZ:

2.59

HAIN:

0.05

PB Ratio

STZ:

2.80

HAIN:

0.34

Total Revenue (TTM)

STZ:

$9.14B

HAIN:

$1.45B

Gross Profit (TTM)

STZ:

$4.71B

HAIN:

$287.26M

EBITDA (TTM)

STZ:

$3.05B

HAIN:

-$304.92M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STZ vs. HAIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STZ
STZ Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
STZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
STZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
STZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
STZ Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

HAIN
HAIN Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
HAIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAIN Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
HAIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAIN Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STZ vs. HAIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) and The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (HAIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


STZHAINDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

0.92

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.79

-0.75

-0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.40

-1.21

-0.20

STZ vs. HAIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.71, which is comparable to the HAIN Sharpe Ratio of -0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STZ and HAIN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


STZHAINDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.71

-0.65

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.38

-0.87

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

-0.66

+0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

-0.04

+0.48

Drawdowns

STZ vs. HAIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STZ drawdown since its inception was -67.39%, smaller than the maximum HAIN drawdown of -99.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STZ and HAIN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STZHAINDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.39%

-99.17%

+31.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.88%

-73.02%

+46.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-51.28%

-95.60%

+44.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.28%

-98.79%

+47.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.53%

-98.95%

+45.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.64%

-98.85%

+51.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.57%

-41.07%

+24.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.18%

45.39%

-30.21%

Volatility

STZ vs. HAIN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) is 8.45%, while The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (HAIN) has a volatility of 25.47%. This indicates that STZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HAIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STZHAINDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.45%

25.47%

-17.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.32%

66.88%

-43.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.02%

84.86%

-54.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.46%

62.47%

-38.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.94%

51.02%

-24.08%

Dividends

STZ vs. HAIN - Dividend Comparison

STZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%, while HAIN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HAIN
The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
3.02%2.95%1.77%1.44%1.36%1.21%1.37%1.58%1.70%0.86%0.98%0.65%

Financials

STZ vs. HAIN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Constellation Brands, Inc. and The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
1.92B
338.36M
(STZ) Total Revenue
(HAIN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

STZ vs. HAIN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Constellation Brands, Inc. and The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
49.0%
20.8%
Portfolio components
STZ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Brands, Inc. reported a gross profit of 941.60M and revenue of 1.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.0%.

HAIN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 70.39M and revenue of 338.36M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.8%.

STZ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Brands, Inc. reported an operating income of 357.10M and revenue of 1.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.6%.

HAIN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 11.31M and revenue of 338.36M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.3%.

STZ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Brands, Inc. reported a net income of 477.70M and revenue of 1.92B, resulting in a net margin of 24.9%.

HAIN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. reported a net income of -106.34M and revenue of 338.36M, resulting in a net margin of -31.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


STZ and HAIN have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HAIN has higher volatility (25.47%) compared to STZ (8.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STZ dropped -67.39% vs HAIN's -99.17%.

HAIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.65 vs -0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STZ and HAIN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer