STYC.L vs. JNKS.L
STYC.L (PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc) and JNKS.L (SPDR Bloomberg SASB U.S. High Yield Corporate ESG UCITS ETF Dist USD) are both High Yield Bonds funds tracking the Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD, from PIMCO and State Street respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, STYC.L returned 5.57%/yr vs 5.48%/yr for JNKS.L. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. STYC.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for JNKS.L.
Performance
STYC.L vs. JNKS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
STYC.L is traded in USD, while JNKS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the JNKS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with STYC.L having a 1.62% return and JNKS.L slightly lower at 1.59%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with STYC.L having a 5.57% annualized return and JNKS.L not far behind at 5.48%.
STYC.L
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.78%
- YTD
- 1.62%
- 6M
- 1.80%
- 1Y
- 6.59%
- 3Y*
- 8.89%
- 5Y*
- 5.14%
- 10Y*
- 5.57%
JNKS.L
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.84%
- YTD
- 1.59%
- 6M
- 1.96%
- 1Y
- 5.67%
- 3Y*
- 9.08%
- 5Y*
- 4.17%
- 10Y*
- 5.48%
STYC.L vs. JNKS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STYC.L PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc | 1.62% | 9.13% | 8.08% | 11.66% | -4.84% | 4.37% | 3.84% | 10.02% | -0.49% | 5.31% |
JNKS.L SPDR Bloomberg SASB U.S. High Yield Corporate ESG UCITS ETF Dist USD | 1.59% | 7.90% | 9.78% | 11.81% | -10.51% | 5.06% | 4.75% | 10.46% | 1.34% | 6.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between STYC.L and JNKS.L is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2015 | 0.48 |
The correlation between STYC.L and JNKS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.56 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STYC.L vs. JNKS.L — Risk / Return Rank
STYC.L
JNKS.L
STYC.L vs. JNKS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc (STYC.L) and SPDR Bloomberg SASB U.S. High Yield Corporate ESG UCITS ETF Dist USD (JNKS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| STYC.L | JNKS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.18 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.90 | 1.74 | +2.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.39 | 6.70 | +8.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
STYC.L vs. JNKS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STYC.L drawdown since its inception was -21.57%, smaller than the maximum JNKS.L drawdown of -37.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STYC.L and JNKS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STYC.L | JNKS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.57% | -37.75% | +16.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.68% | -3.25% | +1.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.94% | -6.65% | +0.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.62% | -16.27% | +6.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.57% | -18.89% | -2.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.19% | -0.28% | +0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.65% | -15.08% | +13.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.43% | 0.84% | -0.41% |
Volatility
STYC.L vs. JNKS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc (STYC.L) is 0.94%, while SPDR Bloomberg SASB U.S. High Yield Corporate ESG UCITS ETF Dist USD (JNKS.L) has a volatility of 2.04%. This indicates that STYC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JNKS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STYC.L | JNKS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.94% | 2.04% | -1.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.72% | 4.35% | -1.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.39% | 5.28% | -1.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.71% | 7.64% | -1.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.46% | 7.72% | -1.26% |
STYC.L vs. JNKS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
STYC.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than JNKS.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
STYC.L vs. JNKS.L - Dividend Comparison
STYC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JNKS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.04%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNKS.L SPDR Bloomberg SASB U.S. High Yield Corporate ESG UCITS ETF Dist USD | 7.04% | 7.46% | 7.05% | 6.76% | 5.45% | 5.30% | 5.84% | 5.85% | 6.76% | 8.27% | 6.83% | 8.11% |
STYC.L PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
STYC.L and JNKS.L have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JNKS.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JNKS.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for STYC.L.
Both ETFs track Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for STYC.L and 0.30% for JNKS.L.
Find the right allocation for STYC.L and JNKS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer