JNKS.L vs. SJNK
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Bloomberg SASB U.S. High Yield Corporate ESG UCITS ETF Dist USD (JNKS.L) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (SJNK).
JNKS.L and SJNK are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. JNKS.L is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD. It was launched on Sep 19, 2013. SJNK is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US High Yield 350mn Cash Pay 2% Capped (0-5 Y). It was launched on Mar 15, 2012. Both JNKS.L and SJNK are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: JNKS.L or SJNK.
Correlation
The correlation between JNKS.L and SJNK is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
JNKS.L vs. SJNK - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
JNKS.L:
2.06
SJNK:
2.78
JNKS.L:
3.37
SJNK:
4.08
JNKS.L:
1.41
SJNK:
1.55
JNKS.L:
4.55
SJNK:
5.72
JNKS.L:
13.42
SJNK:
23.10
JNKS.L:
0.90%
SJNK:
0.41%
JNKS.L:
5.88%
SJNK:
3.44%
JNKS.L:
-14.18%
SJNK:
-19.74%
JNKS.L:
-2.37%
SJNK:
0.00%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JNKS.L achieves a 1.23% return, which is significantly lower than SJNK's 1.71% return. Over the past 10 years, JNKS.L has outperformed SJNK with an annualized return of 6.36%, while SJNK has yielded a comparatively lower 4.58% annualized return.
JNKS.L
1.23%
-1.67%
7.84%
12.31%
4.82%
6.36%
SJNK
1.71%
0.72%
4.32%
9.61%
5.09%
4.58%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JNKS.L vs. SJNK - Expense Ratio Comparison
JNKS.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than SJNK's 0.40% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
JNKS.L vs. SJNK — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
JNKS.L
SJNK
JNKS.L vs. SJNK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg SASB U.S. High Yield Corporate ESG UCITS ETF Dist USD (JNKS.L) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (SJNK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
JNKS.L vs. SJNK - Dividend Comparison
JNKS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.39%, which matches SJNK's 7.38% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNKS.L SPDR Bloomberg SASB U.S. High Yield Corporate ESG UCITS ETF Dist USD | 7.39% | 7.06% | 6.78% | 5.43% | 5.30% | 5.84% | 5.85% | 4.96% | 6.39% | 4.98% | 5.29% | 3.86% |
SJNK SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term High Yield Bond ETF | 7.38% | 7.47% | 7.20% | 5.85% | 4.21% | 5.34% | 5.64% | 5.69% | 5.64% | 5.65% | 5.81% | 5.46% |
Drawdowns
JNKS.L vs. SJNK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JNKS.L drawdown since its inception was -14.18%, smaller than the maximum SJNK drawdown of -19.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNKS.L and SJNK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
JNKS.L vs. SJNK - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Bloomberg SASB U.S. High Yield Corporate ESG UCITS ETF Dist USD (JNKS.L) has a higher volatility of 0.98% compared to SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (SJNK) at 0.75%. This indicates that JNKS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SJNK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.