JNKS.L vs. SHYG.L
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Bloomberg SASB U.S. High Yield Corporate ESG UCITS ETF Dist USD (JNKS.L) and iShares EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (SHYG.L).
JNKS.L and SHYG.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. JNKS.L is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD. It was launched on Sep 19, 2013. SHYG.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Pan Euro HY Euro TR EUR. It was launched on Sep 3, 2010. Both JNKS.L and SHYG.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: JNKS.L or SHYG.L.
Correlation
The correlation between JNKS.L and SHYG.L is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
JNKS.L vs. SHYG.L - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
JNKS.L:
2.03
SHYG.L:
0.97
JNKS.L:
3.32
SHYG.L:
1.47
JNKS.L:
1.40
SHYG.L:
1.18
JNKS.L:
4.48
SHYG.L:
1.40
JNKS.L:
13.40
SHYG.L:
4.86
JNKS.L:
0.89%
SHYG.L:
0.87%
JNKS.L:
5.88%
SHYG.L:
4.33%
JNKS.L:
-14.18%
SHYG.L:
-22.96%
JNKS.L:
-2.67%
SHYG.L:
-0.53%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JNKS.L achieves a 0.92% return, which is significantly lower than SHYG.L's 1.46% return. Over the past 10 years, JNKS.L has outperformed SHYG.L with an annualized return of 6.33%, while SHYG.L has yielded a comparatively lower 4.00% annualized return.
JNKS.L
0.92%
-2.67%
7.68%
11.55%
4.59%
6.33%
SHYG.L
1.46%
-0.20%
1.54%
4.10%
2.09%
4.00%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JNKS.L vs. SHYG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
JNKS.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than SHYG.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
JNKS.L vs. SHYG.L — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
JNKS.L
SHYG.L
JNKS.L vs. SHYG.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg SASB U.S. High Yield Corporate ESG UCITS ETF Dist USD (JNKS.L) and iShares EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (SHYG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
JNKS.L vs. SHYG.L - Dividend Comparison
JNKS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.41%, more than SHYG.L's 6.15% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNKS.L SPDR Bloomberg SASB U.S. High Yield Corporate ESG UCITS ETF Dist USD | 7.41% | 7.06% | 6.78% | 5.43% | 5.30% | 5.84% | 5.85% | 4.96% | 6.39% | 4.98% | 5.29% | 3.86% |
SHYG.L iShares EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) | 6.15% | 6.24% | 5.39% | 3.58% | 3.13% | 3.66% | 3.86% | 3.65% | 3.74% | 3.83% | 4.55% | 5.41% |
Drawdowns
JNKS.L vs. SHYG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JNKS.L drawdown since its inception was -14.18%, smaller than the maximum SHYG.L drawdown of -22.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNKS.L and SHYG.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
JNKS.L vs. SHYG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg SASB U.S. High Yield Corporate ESG UCITS ETF Dist USD (JNKS.L) is 0.99%, while iShares EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (SHYG.L) has a volatility of 2.00%. This indicates that JNKS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SHYG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.