PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STXV vs. FNDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

STXV vs. FNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strive 1000 Value ETF (STXV) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STXV achieves a 12.50% return, which is significantly lower than FNDX's 14.57% return.


STXV

1D
-0.12%
1M
3.00%
YTD
12.50%
6M
13.79%
1Y
27.20%
3Y*
18.06%
5Y*
10Y*

FNDX

1D
-0.13%
1M
3.88%
YTD
14.57%
6M
14.58%
1Y
32.32%
3Y*
20.90%
5Y*
12.82%
10Y*
14.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STXV vs. FNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
STXV
Strive 1000 Value ETF
12.50%16.26%13.34%9.28%-1.46%
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
14.57%16.94%16.77%18.23%-2.10%

Correlation

The correlation between STXV and FNDX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2022

0.93

The correlation between STXV and FNDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

STXV vs. FNDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
STXV
FNDX

Financial Services

21.1%
14.1%

Healthcare

16.5%
12.0%

Technology

12.8%
19.1%

Energy

11.2%
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

7.9%
7.4%

Industrials

7.7%
9.3%

Utilities

6.2%
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

5.8%
9.2%

Communication Services

4.5%
10.1%

Real Estate

3.4%
1.8%

Basic Materials

3.1%
3.7%

Financial Services

STXV
21.1%
FNDX
14.1%

Healthcare

STXV
16.5%
FNDX
12.0%

Technology

STXV
12.8%
FNDX
19.1%

Energy

STXV
11.2%
FNDX
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

STXV
7.9%
FNDX
7.4%

Industrials

STXV
7.7%
FNDX
9.3%

Utilities

STXV
6.2%
FNDX
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

STXV
5.8%
FNDX
9.2%

Communication Services

STXV
4.5%
FNDX
10.1%

Real Estate

STXV
3.4%
FNDX
1.8%

Basic Materials

STXV
3.1%
FNDX
3.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STXV vs. FNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STXV
STXV Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
STXV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STXV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
STXV Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
STXV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
STXV Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

FNDX
FNDX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
FNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STXV vs. FNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive 1000 Value ETF (STXV) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


STXVFNDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.59

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.70

5.35

-0.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.14

20.97

-3.83

STXV vs. FNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STXV Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is comparable to the FNDX Sharpe Ratio of 3.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STXV and FNDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


STXVFNDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.71

3.18

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.07

0.79

+0.28

Drawdowns

STXV vs. FNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STXV drawdown since its inception was -14.80%, smaller than the maximum FNDX drawdown of -37.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STXV and FNDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STXVFNDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.80%

-37.72%

+22.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.81%

-6.06%

+0.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.80%

-16.30%

+1.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-0.13%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.75%

-3.55%

+0.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

1.55%

+0.04%

Volatility

STXV vs. FNDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Strive 1000 Value ETF (STXV) is 2.03%, while Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) has a volatility of 2.25%. This indicates that STXV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STXVFNDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.03%

2.25%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.03%

7.25%

-0.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.08%

10.22%

-0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.22%

15.18%

-1.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.22%

17.50%

-4.28%

STXV vs. FNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

STXV has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

STXV vs. FNDX - Dividend Comparison

STXV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, more than FNDX's 1.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
1.45%1.63%1.76%1.82%2.07%1.64%2.29%2.23%2.40%1.86%2.01%2.01%
STXV
Strive 1000 Value ETF
2.24%2.37%2.36%2.05%0.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, STXV and FNDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FNDX has higher volatility (2.25%) compared to STXV (2.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STXV dropped -14.80% vs FNDX's -37.72%.

On 3-year performance, FNDX leads with 20.90% vs 18.06% for STXV. On fees, STXV is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, STXV has been the lower-risk option at 2.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, FNDX has performed better with a 20.90% return vs 18.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

STXV is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDX.

STXV has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 1.45% for FNDX.

STXV tracks Bloomberg US 1000 Value, while FNDX tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index. They also come from different issuers: Strive and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for STXV and 0.25% for FNDX.

FNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.18 vs 2.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STXV and FNDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer