STXV vs. FNDX
STXV (Strive 1000 Value ETF) and FNDX (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - STXV tracks the Bloomberg US 1000 Value while FNDX tracks the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, STXV returned 18.06%/yr vs 20.90%/yr for FNDX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. STXV charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDX.
Performance
STXV vs. FNDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STXV achieves a 12.50% return, which is significantly lower than FNDX's 14.57% return.
STXV
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 3.00%
- YTD
- 12.50%
- 6M
- 13.79%
- 1Y
- 27.20%
- 3Y*
- 18.06%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FNDX
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 3.88%
- YTD
- 14.57%
- 6M
- 14.58%
- 1Y
- 32.32%
- 3Y*
- 20.90%
- 5Y*
- 12.82%
- 10Y*
- 14.26%
STXV vs. FNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STXV Strive 1000 Value ETF | 12.50% | 16.26% | 13.34% | 9.28% | -1.46% |
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 14.57% | 16.94% | 16.77% | 18.23% | -2.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between STXV and FNDX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2022 | 0.93 |
The correlation between STXV and FNDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
STXV vs. FNDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
STXV
FNDX
Financial Services
Healthcare
Technology
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Financial Services
STXV
FNDX
Healthcare
STXV
FNDX
Technology
STXV
FNDX
Energy
STXV
FNDX
Consumer Defensive
STXV
FNDX
Industrials
STXV
FNDX
Utilities
STXV
FNDX
Consumer Cyclical
STXV
FNDX
Communication Services
STXV
FNDX
Real Estate
STXV
FNDX
Basic Materials
STXV
FNDX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STXV vs. FNDX — Risk / Return Rank
STXV
FNDX
STXV vs. FNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive 1000 Value ETF (STXV) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STXV | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.59 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.70 | 5.35 | -0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.14 | 20.97 | -3.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STXV | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.71 | 3.18 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.07 | 0.79 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
STXV vs. FNDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STXV drawdown since its inception was -14.80%, smaller than the maximum FNDX drawdown of -37.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STXV and FNDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STXV | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.80% | -37.72% | +22.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.81% | -6.06% | +0.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.80% | -16.30% | +1.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -0.13% | +0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.75% | -3.55% | +0.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.59% | 1.55% | +0.04% |
Volatility
STXV vs. FNDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Strive 1000 Value ETF (STXV) is 2.03%, while Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) has a volatility of 2.25%. This indicates that STXV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STXV | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.03% | 2.25% | -0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.03% | 7.25% | -0.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.08% | 10.22% | -0.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.22% | 15.18% | -1.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.22% | 17.50% | -4.28% |
STXV vs. FNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
STXV has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
STXV vs. FNDX - Dividend Comparison
STXV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, more than FNDX's 1.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 1.45% | 1.63% | 1.76% | 1.82% | 2.07% | 1.64% | 2.29% | 2.23% | 2.40% | 1.86% | 2.01% | 2.01% |
STXV Strive 1000 Value ETF | 2.24% | 2.37% | 2.36% | 2.05% | 0.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, STXV and FNDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FNDX has higher volatility (2.25%) compared to STXV (2.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STXV dropped -14.80% vs FNDX's -37.72%.
On 3-year performance, FNDX leads with 20.90% vs 18.06% for STXV. On fees, STXV is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, STXV has been the lower-risk option at 2.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FNDX has performed better with a 20.90% return vs 18.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
STXV is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDX.
STXV has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 1.45% for FNDX.
STXV tracks Bloomberg US 1000 Value, while FNDX tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index. They also come from different issuers: Strive and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for STXV and 0.25% for FNDX.
FNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.18 vs 2.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STXV and FNDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer